vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CLEAN HARBORS INC (CLH) and Sky Quarry Inc. (SKYQ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sky Quarry Inc. runs the higher net margin — 324.3% vs 5.8%, a 318.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. CLEAN HARBORS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.3M vs $1.1M).
Clean Harbors, Inc., headquartered in Norwell, Massachusetts, is a provider of waste management and industrial services for commercial customers, specializing in the collection, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous waste, but also offering services for non-hazardous waste. The company has 870 operating locations in 630 properties in the U.S. and Canada including a network of over 100 waste disposal facilities such as incinerators, landfills, treatment, storage and disposal faci...
Sky UK Limited, trading as Sky, is a British broadcaster and telecommunications company that provides television, broadband internet, fixed line and mobile telephone services to consumers and businesses in the United Kingdom. It is a subsidiary of Sky Group and is headquartered at the Sky Studios in Isleworth.
CLH vs SKYQ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $-883.4K |
| Net Profit | $86.6M | $-2.9M |
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | 136.4% |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | 259.4% |
| Net Margin | 5.8% | 324.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.8% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.62 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $-883.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $-318.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $-901.6K | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | $86.6M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.8M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.9M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.7M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $84.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $69.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | 30.6% | 136.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | 259.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.5% | 241.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | 546.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | 295.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | 324.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 357.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 693.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 369.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.62 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.21 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.36 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.09 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.55 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.12 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.46 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.29 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $127.4M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $3.2M |
| Total Assets | $7.6B | $19.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $127.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $105.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $104.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $5.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $9.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | $7.6B | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $20.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4B | $22.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $24.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $355.1M | $1.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.3M | $1.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.6% | -128.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.1% | -4.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.10× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $441.8M | $-3.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $355.1M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $302.0M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $208.0M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $303.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $239.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $216.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $233.3M | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $207.5M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.0M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-117.1M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $241.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-119.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | -128.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.4% | 123.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | 390.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.2% | 221.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | -4.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | -4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | -3.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.10× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.54× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.64× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.62× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.08× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.62× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.27× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLH
| Technical Services | $479.3M | 32% |
| Safetly Kleen Environmental Services | $252.9M | 17% |
| Fieldand Emergency Response | $246.6M | 16% |
| Products | $205.3M | 14% |
| Safety Kleen Sustainability Solutions Segment | $188.4M | 13% |
| Safety Kleen Oil | $132.6M | 9% |
SKYQ
Segment breakdown not available.
