vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Allegion (ALLE) and Teradyne (TER). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Teradyne is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $1.0B, roughly 1.2× Allegion). Teradyne runs the higher net margin — 31.1% vs 13.4%, a 17.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Teradyne posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (87.0% vs 9.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Teradyne's revenue compounded faster (32.6% CAGR vs 3.5%).
Allegion plc manufactures and sells mechanical and electronic security products and solutions worldwide. The company offers door closers, controls, and exit devices; locks, locksets, portable locks, and key systems and services; electronic security products and access control systems; time, attendance, and workforce productivity systems; doors and door systems; and other accessories. The company sells its products and solutions to end-users in commercial, institutional, and residential facili...
Teradyne, Inc. is an American automatic test equipment (ATE) designer and manufacturer based in North Reading, Massachusetts. Its high-profile customers include Samsung, Qualcomm, Intel, Analog Devices, Texas Instruments and IBM.
ALLE vs TER — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0B | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $138.1M | $398.9M |
| Gross Margin | 44.0% | 60.9% |
| Operating Margin | 18.9% | 36.9% |
| Net Margin | 13.4% | 31.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.7% | 87.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -6.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $2.53 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $769.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $651.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $941.9M | $685.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $945.6M | $752.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $967.1M | $737.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $965.6M | $729.9M |
| Q1 26 | $138.1M | $398.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $147.5M | $257.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $188.4M | $119.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.7M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $148.2M | $98.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $144.1M | $146.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $174.2M | $145.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.4M | $186.3M |
| Q1 26 | 44.0% | 60.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 44.5% | 57.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.8% | 58.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.6% | 57.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.9% | 60.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.1% | 59.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.7% | 59.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.4% | 58.3% |
| Q1 26 | 18.9% | 36.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.3% | 27.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.8% | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.5% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.9% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.5% | 20.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.6% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | 13.4% | 31.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.3% | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.6% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.6% | 12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.7% | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.2% | 19.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.0% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | 25.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.53 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.70 | $1.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.18 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.85 | $0.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.71 | $0.61 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.65 | $0.89 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.99 | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.77 | $1.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $308.9M | $241.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.0B | $0 |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.1B | — |
| Total Assets | $5.3B | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.97× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $308.9M | $241.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $356.2M | $293.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $302.7M | $272.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $656.8M | $339.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $494.5M | $475.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $503.8M | $553.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $878.9M | $510.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $747.5M | $421.9M |
| Q1 26 | $2.0B | $0 | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | $5.3B | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.2B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.9B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | $3.6B |
| Q1 26 | 0.97× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.96× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.16× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.24× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.53× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.69× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $101.3M | $265.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.73× | 0.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $101.3M | $265.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $240.1M | $281.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $229.5M | $49.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $209.7M | $182.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $104.5M | $161.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $219.0M | $282.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.9M | $166.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.0M | $216.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $200.5M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $209.8M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $192.0M | $131.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.4M | $97.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $194.9M | $225.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $212.0M | $114.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $152.1M | $171.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.4% | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.8% | 20.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.9% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.9% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.8% | 23.5% |
| Q1 26 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 6.1% |
| Q1 26 | 0.73× | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.63× | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.22× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.31× | 2.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.71× | 1.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.52× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.33× | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.11× | 1.16× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALLE
| Allegion Americas | $809.9M | 78% |
| Allegion International | $223.7M | 22% |
TER
Segment breakdown not available.