vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Allot Ltd. (ALLT) and NIP Group Inc. (NIPG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NIP Group Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($39.3M vs $24.1M, roughly 1.6× Allot Ltd.). Allot Ltd. runs the higher net margin — -7.0% vs -11.9%, a 4.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Allot Ltd., formerly Allot Communications, is an Israeli high-tech company that develops telecommunications software. The company is headquartered in Hod Hasharon, Israel.
ALLT vs NIPG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $24.1M | $39.3M |
| Net Profit | $-1.7M | $-4.7M |
| Gross Margin | 72.1% | 6.0% |
| Operating Margin | -1.7% | -13.0% |
| Net Margin | -7.0% | -11.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.5% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 49.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.04 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | $24.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.2M | $39.3M | ||
| Q2 23 | $25.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $32.8M | — |
| Q2 25 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-332.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.4M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | $-20.7M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-6.2M | — |
| Q2 25 | 72.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 69.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 68.5% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 23 | 69.2% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 68.7% | — |
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -15.2% | -13.0% | ||
| Q2 23 | -85.8% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -19.8% | — |
| Q2 25 | -7.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -15.1% | -11.9% | ||
| Q2 23 | -82.8% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -19.0% | — |
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-0.55 | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-0.17 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $60.1M | $6.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $99.7M | — |
| Total Assets | $154.1M | $305.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $60.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.9M | $6.8M | ||
| Q2 23 | $15.5M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $15.5M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.8M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | $99.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.7M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $76.1M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $114.4M | — |
| Q2 25 | $154.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $140.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $132.5M | $305.3M | ||
| Q2 23 | $177.8M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $229.3M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $4.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-6.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $4.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-11.3M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-7.8M | — |
| Q2 25 | $4.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $217.0K | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-11.6M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-9.1M | — |
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -46.4% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -27.7% | — |
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 3.9% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
