vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aeluma, Inc. (ALMU) and AMBARELLA INC (AMBA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMBARELLA INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($108.5M vs $1.3M, roughly 85.3× Aeluma, Inc.). AMBARELLA INC runs the higher net margin — -13.9% vs -145.7%, a 131.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMBARELLA INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (31.2% vs -21.1%). AMBARELLA INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($31.4M vs $-282.0K).
Aeluma, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered technology firm focused on the design, development, and production of high-performance optoelectronic components and semiconductor products. Its core offerings include photonic sensors and laser diodes, serving the LiDAR, 5G/6G communication, industrial sensing, and automotive markets across North America and the Asia-Pacific region.
Ambarella, Inc. is an American fabless semiconductor design company, focusing on low-power, high-definition (HD) and Ultra HD video compression, image processing, and computer vision processors. Ambarella's products are used in a wide variety of human and computer vision applications, including video security, advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), electronic mirror, drive recorder, driver and in-cabin monitoring, autonomous driving, and robotics applications. Ambarella's system on chips ...
ALMU vs AMBA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 2026 vs Q3 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3M | $108.5M |
| Net Profit | $-1.9M | $-15.1M |
| Gross Margin | 27.8% | 59.6% |
| Operating Margin | -163.6% | -15.0% |
| Net Margin | -145.7% | -13.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -21.1% | 31.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 36.0% | 37.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $-0.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.3M | $108.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $95.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $85.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $84.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $82.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $63.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $54.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $51.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.9M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.5M | $-20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-24.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-20.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-24.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-34.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-37.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-60.6M |
| Q4 25 | 27.8% | 59.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 49.4% | 58.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 60.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 60.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 60.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 60.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 60.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 59.8% |
| Q4 25 | -163.6% | -15.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -116.1% | -23.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -30.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -30.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -30.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -56.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -72.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -80.8% |
| Q4 25 | -145.7% | -13.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -107.8% | -20.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -28.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -24.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -29.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -54.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -69.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -117.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | $-0.47 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.58 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.48 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.58 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.85 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.93 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.51 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $38.6M | $174.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $40.8M | $590.1M |
| Total Assets | $42.6M | $751.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $38.6M | $174.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $142.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $141.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $144.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $127.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $153.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $131.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $144.9M |
| Q4 25 | $40.8M | $590.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.9M | $576.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $572.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $561.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $554.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $547.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $555.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $559.9M |
| Q4 25 | $42.6M | $751.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.7M | $706.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $701.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $689.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $670.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $650.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $638.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $657.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-251.0K | $34.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-282.0K | $31.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -22.2% | 29.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.4% | 2.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $64.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-251.0K | $34.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-815.0K | $5.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $25.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $16.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-15.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-282.0K | $31.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.0M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $21.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $14.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-16.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-6.0M |
| Q4 25 | -22.2% | 29.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -74.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 25.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -29.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -11.6% |
| Q4 25 | 2.4% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.7% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALMU
Segment breakdown not available.
AMBA
| TW | $76.0M | 70% |
| Asia Pacific Other Than Taiwan | $20.2M | 19% |
| North America Other Than United States | $7.4M | 7% |
| Other | $5.0M | 5% |
