vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aeluma, Inc. (ALMU) and ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Aeluma, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3M vs $1.0M, roughly 1.2× ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.). ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -131.6% vs -145.7%, a 14.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (36.6% vs -21.1%). Aeluma, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-282.0K vs $-1.7M).
Aeluma, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered technology firm focused on the design, development, and production of high-performance optoelectronic components and semiconductor products. Its core offerings include photonic sensors and laser diodes, serving the LiDAR, 5G/6G communication, industrial sensing, and automotive markets across North America and the Asia-Pacific region.
ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. develops and supplies eco-friendly construction materials, environmental remediation services, and solid waste treatment solutions. Its core offerings include recycled construction aggregates, soil improvement products, and ecological restoration systems, primarily serving infrastructure, real estate, and environmental conservation sectors across the Chinese market.
ALMU vs RETO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3M | $1.0M |
| Net Profit | $-1.9M | $-1.4M |
| Gross Margin | 27.8% | 17.7% |
| Operating Margin | -163.6% | -133.0% |
| Net Margin | -145.7% | -131.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -21.1% | 36.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 36.0% | -103.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $768.4K | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $2.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-678.5K | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-5.7M |
| Q4 25 | 27.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 49.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.3% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 13.0% |
| Q4 25 | -163.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -116.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -133.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -68.0% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -195.8% |
| Q4 25 | -145.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -107.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -131.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -88.3% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -196.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.25 | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-0.16 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $38.6M | $2.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $40.8M | $30.4M |
| Total Assets | $42.6M | $41.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $38.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $832.4K |
| Q4 25 | $40.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $30.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.3M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $13.5M |
| Q4 25 | $42.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $41.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $33.7M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $33.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-251.0K | $-1.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-282.0K | $-1.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -22.2% | -157.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.4% | 5.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-251.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-815.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.8M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-9.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-282.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -22.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -74.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -157.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
