vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AlTi Global, Inc. (ALTI) and AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $86.6M, roughly 1.2× AlTi Global, Inc.). AlTi Global, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -15.1% vs -55.2%, a 40.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AlTi Global, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (87.0% vs 11.5%). AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-64.0K vs $-52.2M). Over the past eight quarters, AlTi Global, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (30.6% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Cristal Global is the world's second-largest producer of titanium dioxide and a leading producer of titanium chemicals. It was formed when The National Titanium Dioxide Company Ltd. combined with Millennium Chemicals. The headquarters are in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. It is a significant shareholder in Bemax, the world’s 5th largest TiO2 feedstock producer.
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
ALTI vs AP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $86.6M | $104.4M |
| Net Profit | $-13.1M | $-57.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -2.1% | -54.0% |
| Net Margin | -15.1% | -55.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 87.0% | 11.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 75.6% | -1958.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-2.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $86.6M | $104.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.2M | $103.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.1M | $108.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.0M | $99.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.3M | $93.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.8M | $92.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.5M | $107.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $50.8M | $110.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-13.1M | $-57.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-84.1M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.4M | $-7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-53.8M | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-72.5M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.4M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.7M | $-2.7M |
| Q4 25 | -2.1% | -54.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -49.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -56.7% | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -23.3% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -42.7% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -18.4% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -30.2% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -28.9% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | -15.1% | -55.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -147.0% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -45.9% | -6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -116.1% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -140.0% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 58.4% | -2.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.87 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.33 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.04 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.71 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.88 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.18 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.18 | $-0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.2M | $10.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $883.0K | $117.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $600.1M | $32.6M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $495.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | 3.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $41.2M | $10.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.8M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $42.4M | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $52.8M | $7.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.4M | $15.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $220.6M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $134.2M | $10.8M |
| Q4 25 | $883.0K | $117.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $586.0K | $119.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $673.0K | $115.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $115.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $128.4M | $116.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $164.0M | $119.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $183.7M | $116.2M |
| Q4 25 | $600.1M | $32.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $607.2M | $60.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $685.4M | $62.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $665.2M | $64.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $658.4M | $58.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $707.0M | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $540.2M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $510.9M | $56.3M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $495.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $524.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $537.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $536.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $530.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $547.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $560.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $565.8M |
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | 3.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | 1.98× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | 1.85× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.78× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | 1.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.18× | 1.89× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.30× | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.36× | 2.06× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-51.4M | $2.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-52.2M | $-64.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -60.3% | -0.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | 2.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-8.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-51.4M | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-53.5M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.9M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-30.2M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-50.7M | $7.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.9M | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-30.2M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.5M | $4.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-52.2M | $-64.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.0M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-31.0M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-58.2M | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.4M | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-31.2M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.7M | $1.7M |
| Q4 25 | -60.3% | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -37.6% | -3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -53.4% | -7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -125.7% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -18.2% | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -63.2% | -7.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -30.9% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.3% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.7% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | 2.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -15.80× | -4.62× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2.64× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.52× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALTI
| Management Advisory Fees | $51.1M | 59% |
| Other | $32.7M | 38% |
| Distributions From Investments | $2.9M | 3% |
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
