vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALLURION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (ALUR) and Rigetti Computing, Inc. (RGTI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ALLURION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.6M vs $1.9M, roughly 1.9× Rigetti Computing, Inc.). ALLURION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. runs the higher net margin — -167.0% vs -974.7%, a 807.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Rigetti Computing, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-17.9% vs -35.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Rigetti Computing, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-21.8% CAGR vs -38.0%).
Robinson Technologies is a Japanese video game developer founded by Seth Robinson. The company produced the BBS door games Legend of the Red Dragon, Planets: The Exploration of Space and Growtopia, an experimental multiplayer creative sandbox created as a collaboration with Hamumu Software, released in 2013 for iOS, Android, Microsoft Windows, and macOS.
Rigetti Computing, Inc. is a Berkeley, California-based developer of superconducting quantum integrated circuits used for quantum computers. Rigetti also develops a cloud platform called Forest that enables programmers to write quantum algorithms.
ALUR vs RGTI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.6M | $1.9M |
| Net Profit | $-6.0M | $-18.2M |
| Gross Margin | 44.5% | 34.9% |
| Operating Margin | -174.2% | -1209.7% |
| Net Margin | -167.0% | -974.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -35.4% | -17.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 37.2% | 88.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.69 | $-0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.6M | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7M | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4M | $1.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6M | $1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.6M | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8M | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.4M | $3.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-6.0M | $-18.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.9M | $-201.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.3M | $-39.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.5M | $42.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.6M | $-153.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.7M | $-14.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.3M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0M | $-20.8M |
| Q4 25 | 44.5% | 34.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 49.1% | 20.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 73.9% | 31.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 74.6% | 30.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.3% | 44.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 58.0% | 50.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 76.4% | 64.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 73.2% | 49.1% |
| Q4 25 | -174.2% | -1209.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -362.3% | -1055.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -205.7% | -1103.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -130.5% | -1469.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -306.2% | -813.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -229.9% | -729.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -79.4% | -521.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -121.4% | -543.4% |
| Q4 25 | -167.0% | -974.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -447.1% | -10321.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -276.3% | -2201.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -26.9% | 2895.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -171.8% | -6726.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 162.8% | -623.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -70.7% | -402.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.3% | -680.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.69 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.53 | $-0.62 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.28 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.31 | $0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.22 | $-0.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.40 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.34 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.96 | $-0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.4M | $44.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-77.2M | $546.2M |
| Total Assets | $15.8M | $666.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | $44.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1M | $26.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7M | $57.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.4M | $37.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $67.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.7M | $20.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.3M | $20.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.7M | $35.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-77.2M | $546.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-82.9M | $371.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-64.0M | $553.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-69.8M | $207.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-78.0M | $126.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-64.8M | $122.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-70.6M | $122.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-66.2M | $115.6M |
| Q4 25 | $15.8M | $666.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.1M | $630.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.2M | $636.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.4M | $269.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.8M | $284.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.7M | $157.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.5M | $162.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $60.0M | $162.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-5.3M | $-14.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-19.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -1042.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 244.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-77.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-5.3M | $-14.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.5M | $-13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.6M | $-16.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.5M | $-13.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.3M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.5M | $-15.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.9M | $-13.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.6M | $-13.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-19.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-19.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-21.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-16.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-9.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.5M | $-17.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.4M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.7M | $-18.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | -1042.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1012.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1212.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1100.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -432.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -214.9% | -744.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -79.6% | -504.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -93.1% | -610.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 244.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 302.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 314.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 173.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 56.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | 95.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 66.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.1% | 180.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.31× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.33× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALUR
| ES | $2.2M | 60% |
| Other | $1.5M | 40% |
RGTI
| Collaborative Research And Other Professional Services | $1.7M | 93% |
| Other | $131.0K | 7% |
