vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Antero Midstream Corp (AM) and e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($489.5M vs $291.1M, roughly 1.7× Antero Midstream Corp). Antero Midstream Corp runs the higher net margin — 41.5% vs 8.0%, a 33.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (37.8% vs -7.3%). Antero Midstream Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($186.9M vs $52.8M).
Antero Resources Corporation is an American company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Denver, Colorado. The company's reserves are entirely in the Appalachian Basin and are extracted using hydraulic fracturing.
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. is an American cosmetics brand based in Oakland, California. It was founded by Joseph Shamah and Scott Vincent Borba in 2004. The company sells items include bath and skin-care products, mineral-based makeup, professional tools, eyeliners, lipstick, glosses, blushes, bronzers, brushes and mascara. Its products are sold in 18 countries and in several stores including Target, Kmart, Dollar General and Walmart. Over half the company's sales come from its website, which is als...
AM vs ELF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $291.1M | $489.5M |
| Net Profit | $120.7M | $39.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 71.0% |
| Operating Margin | 60.9% | 13.8% |
| Net Margin | 41.5% | 8.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.3% | 37.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 2.1% | 128.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.25 | $0.65 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $291.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $297.0M | $489.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $294.8M | $343.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $305.5M | $353.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $291.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $287.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $269.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $269.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | $120.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $51.9M | $39.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.0M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $124.5M | $33.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $120.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $111.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $99.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $86.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 71.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 69.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 69.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 60.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 33.8% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 61.2% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 61.0% | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 61.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 41.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.5% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.3% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.8% | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.25 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.11 | $0.65 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.24 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.26 | $0.58 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.25 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.23 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.21 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.18 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $180.4M | $196.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | $816.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.0B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $5.9B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.63× | 0.70× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $180.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $180.4M | $196.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $194.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $170.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $816.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $831.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $256.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $804.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $5.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.9B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.63× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.63× | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.46× | 0.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.45× | 0.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.50× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $198.9M | $59.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $186.9M | $52.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 64.2% | 10.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 11.1% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.65× | 1.51× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $198.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $255.5M | $59.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.8M | $23.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $265.2M | $27.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $198.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $232.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $184.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $215.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | $186.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $52.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $16.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $20.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $184.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $147.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | 64.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 68.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.65× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.92× | 1.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.84× | 7.82× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.13× | 0.82× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.65× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.09× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.51× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AM
| Gathering and compression–Antero Resources | $238.0M | 82% |
| Other | $52.3M | 18% |
| Water handling–third party | $505.0K | 0% |
| Gathering and compression–third party | $295.0K | 0% |
ELF
Segment breakdown not available.
