vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMBARELLA INC (AMBA) and BANCFIRST CORP (BANF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BANCFIRST CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($181.0M vs $108.5M, roughly 1.7× AMBARELLA INC). BANCFIRST CORP runs the higher net margin — 32.9% vs -13.9%, a 46.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMBARELLA INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (31.2% vs 11.1%). BANCFIRST CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($237.0M vs $31.4M). Over the past eight quarters, AMBARELLA INC's revenue compounded faster (45.0% CAGR vs 9.5%).
Ambarella, Inc. is an American fabless semiconductor design company, focusing on low-power, high-definition (HD) and Ultra HD video compression, image processing, and computer vision processors. Ambarella's products are used in a wide variety of human and computer vision applications, including video security, advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), electronic mirror, drive recorder, driver and in-cabin monitoring, autonomous driving, and robotics applications. Ambarella's system on chips ...
BancFirst Corporation is an Oklahoma-based financial services holding company. The company operates three subsidiary banks, BancFirst, an Oklahoma state-chartered bank; and Pegasus Bank and Worthington Bank, both Texas state-chartered banks.
AMBA vs BANF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $108.5M | $181.0M |
| Net Profit | $-15.1M | $59.5M |
| Gross Margin | 59.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -15.0% | 41.6% |
| Net Margin | -13.9% | 32.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 31.2% | 11.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 37.2% | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.35 | $1.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $108.5M | $181.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.5M | $175.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.9M | $169.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $84.0M | $164.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.7M | $162.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.7M | $163.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.5M | $153.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.6M | $151.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-15.1M | $59.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.0M | $62.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.3M | $62.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.2M | $56.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-24.1M | $56.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.9M | $58.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.9M | $50.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-60.6M | $50.3M |
| Q4 25 | 59.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 60.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -15.0% | 41.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.0% | 45.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.1% | 47.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.2% | 43.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.9% | 44.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -56.9% | 45.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -72.4% | 42.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -80.8% | 42.5% |
| Q4 25 | -13.9% | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.9% | 35.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -28.3% | 36.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.1% | 34.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.1% | 34.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -54.8% | 36.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -69.6% | 32.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -117.4% | 33.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.35 | $1.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.47 | $1.85 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.58 | $1.85 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.48 | $1.66 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.58 | $1.68 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.85 | $1.75 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.93 | $1.51 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.51 | $1.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $174.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $590.1M | $1.9B |
| Total Assets | $751.9M | $14.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $174.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $142.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $144.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $131.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $590.1M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $576.5M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $572.7M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $561.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $554.3M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.6M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $555.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $559.9M | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $751.9M | $14.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $706.4M | $14.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $701.9M | $14.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $689.0M | $14.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $670.8M | $13.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $650.3M | $13.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $638.7M | $12.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $657.7M | $12.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $34.3M | $285.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.4M | $237.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 29.0% | 130.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 26.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.79× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $64.3M | $430.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.3M | $285.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5M | $75.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.8M | $78.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.4M | $77.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | $261.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.7M | $77.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.0M | $100.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $66.3M |
| Q4 25 | $31.4M | $237.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $63.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $64.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.2M | $65.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $224.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.2M | $72.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.1M | $94.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.0M | $56.1M |
| Q4 25 | 29.0% | 130.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 36.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | 38.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.3% | 39.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 137.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | 44.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -29.5% | 61.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.6% | 37.1% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 26.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 8.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 22.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | 6.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.79× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.20× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.32× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMBA
| TW | $76.0M | 70% |
| Asia Pacific Other Than Taiwan | $20.2M | 19% |
| North America Other Than United States | $7.4M | 7% |
| Other | $5.0M | 5% |
BANF
Segment breakdown not available.
