vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMBARELLA INC (AMBA) and SAUL CENTERS, INC. (BFS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMBARELLA INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($108.5M vs $75.1M, roughly 1.4× SAUL CENTERS, INC.). SAUL CENTERS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 8.7% vs -13.9%, a 22.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMBARELLA INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (31.2% vs 10.6%). Over the past eight quarters, AMBARELLA INC's revenue compounded faster (45.0% CAGR vs 6.2%).
Ambarella, Inc. is an American fabless semiconductor design company, focusing on low-power, high-definition (HD) and Ultra HD video compression, image processing, and computer vision processors. Ambarella's products are used in a wide variety of human and computer vision applications, including video security, advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), electronic mirror, drive recorder, driver and in-cabin monitoring, autonomous driving, and robotics applications. Ambarella's system on chips ...
Saul Centers, Inc. is a self-administered real estate investment trust (REIT) headquartered in the United States. It primarily owns, operates, and develops high-quality shopping centers, mixed-use properties, and multifamily residential assets, with its core portfolio concentrated in the Washington D.C. metropolitan area and other select high-growth U.S. regional markets.
AMBA vs BFS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $108.5M | $75.1M |
| Net Profit | $-15.1M | $6.5M |
| Gross Margin | 59.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -15.0% | 65.4% |
| Net Margin | -13.9% | 8.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 31.2% | 10.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 37.2% | -19.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.35 | $0.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $108.5M | $75.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.5M | $72.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.9M | $70.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $84.0M | $71.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.7M | $67.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.7M | $67.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.5M | $66.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.6M | $66.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-15.1M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.0M | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.3M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.2M | $9.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-24.1M | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.9M | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.9M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-60.6M | $13.6M |
| Q4 25 | 59.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 60.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.8% | 73.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.9% | 74.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.8% | 72.8% |
| Q4 25 | -15.0% | 65.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.0% | 69.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.1% | 68.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.2% | 66.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.9% | 82.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -56.9% | 72.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -72.4% | 75.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -80.8% | 72.4% |
| Q4 25 | -13.9% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.9% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -28.3% | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.1% | 13.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.1% | 11.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -54.8% | 21.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -69.6% | 21.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -117.4% | 20.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.35 | $0.15 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.47 | $0.32 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.58 | $0.33 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.48 | $0.29 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.58 | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.85 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.93 | $0.48 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.51 | $0.45 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $174.1M | $8.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $468.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $590.1M | $307.8M |
| Total Assets | $751.9M | $2.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $174.1M | $8.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $142.7M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.3M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $144.6M | $6.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.1M | $10.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.9M | $7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $131.8M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.9M | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $468.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $455.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $590.1M | $307.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $576.5M | $316.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $572.7M | $322.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $561.4M | $328.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $554.3M | $335.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.6M | $341.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $555.4M | $345.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $559.9M | $347.1M |
| Q4 25 | $751.9M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $706.4M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $701.9M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $689.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $670.8M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $650.3M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $638.7M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $657.7M | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.85× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.37× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.17× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.06× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $34.3M | $99.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 29.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 15.35× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $64.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.3M | $99.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5M | $20.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.8M | $26.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.4M | $30.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | $121.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.7M | $26.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.0M | $32.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $33.8M |
| Q4 25 | $31.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.2M | $-28.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.1M | $-12.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.0M | $-11.7M |
| Q4 25 | 29.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | -42.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -29.5% | -18.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.6% | -17.6% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 81.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 66.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | 68.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 15.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.97× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.10× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.83× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.48× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMBA
| TW | $76.0M | 70% |
| Asia Pacific Other Than Taiwan | $20.2M | 19% |
| North America Other Than United States | $7.4M | 7% |
| Other | $5.0M | 5% |
BFS
Segment breakdown not available.
