vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMBARELLA INC (AMBA) and Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. (BHRB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMBARELLA INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($108.5M vs $86.5M, roughly 1.3× Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.). Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. runs the higher net margin — 34.9% vs -13.9%, a 48.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMBARELLA INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (31.2% vs 4.9%). Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($96.2M vs $31.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (81.1% CAGR vs 45.0%).
Ambarella, Inc. is an American fabless semiconductor design company, focusing on low-power, high-definition (HD) and Ultra HD video compression, image processing, and computer vision processors. Ambarella's products are used in a wide variety of human and computer vision applications, including video security, advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), electronic mirror, drive recorder, driver and in-cabin monitoring, autonomous driving, and robotics applications. Ambarella's system on chips ...
Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp is a U.S.-based regional financial holding company, offering personal and commercial banking, wealth management, residential mortgage lending, and small business financing services. Its core market covers Virginia and adjacent Mid-Atlantic regions, serving retail consumers, SMEs, and high-net-worth clients.
AMBA vs BHRB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $108.5M | $86.5M |
| Net Profit | $-15.1M | $30.2M |
| Gross Margin | 59.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -15.0% | 43.8% |
| Net Margin | -13.9% | 34.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 31.2% | 4.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 37.2% | 52.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.35 | $1.98 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $108.5M | $86.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.5M | $85.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.9M | $87.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $84.0M | $83.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.7M | $82.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.7M | $83.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.5M | $69.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.6M | $26.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-15.1M | $30.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.0M | $30.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.3M | $29.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.2M | $27.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-24.1M | $19.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.9M | $27.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.9M | $-16.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-60.6M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | 59.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 60.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -15.0% | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.0% | 43.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.1% | 42.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.2% | 39.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.9% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -56.9% | 39.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -72.4% | -27.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -80.8% | 22.3% |
| Q4 25 | -13.9% | 34.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.9% | 35.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -28.3% | 34.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.1% | 32.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.1% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -54.8% | 33.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -69.6% | -24.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -117.4% | 19.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.35 | $1.98 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.47 | $1.97 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.58 | $1.97 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.48 | $1.80 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.58 | $1.72 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.85 | $1.82 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.93 | $-1.41 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.51 | $0.69 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $174.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $590.1M | $854.6M |
| Total Assets | $751.9M | $7.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $174.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $142.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $144.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $131.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $590.1M | $854.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $576.5M | $822.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $572.7M | $780.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $561.4M | $758.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $554.3M | $730.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.6M | $738.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $555.4M | $693.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $559.9M | $319.3M |
| Q4 25 | $751.9M | $7.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $706.4M | $7.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $701.9M | $8.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $689.0M | $7.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $670.8M | $7.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $650.3M | $7.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $638.7M | $7.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $657.7M | $3.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $34.3M | $107.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.4M | $96.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 29.0% | 111.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 13.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.57× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $64.3M | $164.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.3M | $107.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5M | $39.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.8M | $41.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.4M | $37.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | $85.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.7M | $47.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.0M | $-46.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | $31.4M | $96.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $35.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.2M | $35.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $81.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.2M | $46.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.1M | $-47.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.0M | $5.6M |
| Q4 25 | 29.0% | 111.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 41.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | -3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.3% | 43.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 98.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | 55.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -29.5% | -67.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.6% | 21.2% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | 5.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.57× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.38× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.36× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMBA
| TW | $76.0M | 70% |
| Asia Pacific Other Than Taiwan | $20.2M | 19% |
| North America Other Than United States | $7.4M | 7% |
| Other | $5.0M | 5% |
BHRB
Segment breakdown not available.
