vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. (BHRB) and ZIPRECRUITER, INC. (ZIP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ZIPRECRUITER, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($111.7M vs $86.5M, roughly 1.3× Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.). Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. runs the higher net margin — 34.9% vs -0.7%, a 35.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.9% vs 0.6%). Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($96.2M vs $7.6M). Over the past eight quarters, Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (81.1% CAGR vs -4.4%).
Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp is a U.S.-based regional financial holding company, offering personal and commercial banking, wealth management, residential mortgage lending, and small business financing services. Its core market covers Virginia and adjacent Mid-Atlantic regions, serving retail consumers, SMEs, and high-net-worth clients.
ZipRecruiter, Inc. is an American employment marketplace for job seekers and employers.
BHRB vs ZIP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $86.5M | $111.7M |
| Net Profit | $30.2M | $-835.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 89.1% |
| Operating Margin | 43.8% | 3.6% |
| Net Margin | 34.9% | -0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.9% | 0.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 52.8% | 92.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.98 | $-0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $86.5M | $111.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.4M | $115.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.1M | $112.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.0M | $110.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.5M | $111.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.8M | $117.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.3M | $123.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.4M | $122.2M |
| Q4 25 | $30.2M | $-835.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.0M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.9M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.2M | $-12.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.8M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.6M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.9M | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $-6.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 89.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 89.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 89.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 89.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 89.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 89.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 89.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 89.1% |
| Q4 25 | 43.8% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.3% | -4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.7% | -5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.6% | -10.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.6% | -3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.2% | -2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -27.5% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.3% | -0.7% |
| Q4 25 | 34.9% | -0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.1% | -8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.3% | -8.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.8% | -11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.0% | -2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.4% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.8% | -5.3% |
| Q4 25 | $1.98 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.97 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.97 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.80 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.72 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.82 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.41 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.69 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $188.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $854.6M | $-77.2M |
| Total Assets | $7.9B | $569.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $188.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $211.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $203.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $221.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $218.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $225.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $271.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $282.5M |
| Q4 25 | $854.6M | $-77.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $822.2M | $-76.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $780.0M | $-65.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $758.0M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $730.2M | $13.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $738.1M | $13.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $693.1M | $24.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $319.3M | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | $7.9B | $569.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9B | $573.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1B | $592.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8B | $629.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8B | $664.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9B | $652.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.8B | $665.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.7B | $662.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $107.9M | $7.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $96.2M | $7.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 111.2% | 6.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.5% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.57× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $164.1M | $9.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $107.9M | $7.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.3M | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.0K | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.6M | $-9.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.8M | $12.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.8M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-46.0M | $21.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | $96.2M | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.4M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4M | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.9M | $-10.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.2M | $12.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.0M | $9.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-47.0M | $21.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.6M | $1.9M |
| Q4 25 | 111.2% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.9% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.2% | -9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 98.5% | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -67.8% | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | 13.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.7% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | 3.57× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.31× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.38× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.33× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.73× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.36× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BHRB
Segment breakdown not available.
ZIP
| License | $84.3M | 75% |
| Services | $27.4M | 25% |