vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMBARELLA INC (AMBA) and CAPITAL CITY BANK GROUP INC (CCBG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMBARELLA INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($108.5M vs $63.5M, roughly 1.7× CAPITAL CITY BANK GROUP INC). CAPITAL CITY BANK GROUP INC runs the higher net margin — 21.6% vs -13.9%, a 35.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMBARELLA INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (31.2% vs 6.0%). CAPITAL CITY BANK GROUP INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($80.0M vs $31.4M). Over the past eight quarters, AMBARELLA INC's revenue compounded faster (45.0% CAGR vs 6.0%).
Ambarella, Inc. is an American fabless semiconductor design company, focusing on low-power, high-definition (HD) and Ultra HD video compression, image processing, and computer vision processors. Ambarella's products are used in a wide variety of human and computer vision applications, including video security, advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), electronic mirror, drive recorder, driver and in-cabin monitoring, autonomous driving, and robotics applications. Ambarella's system on chips ...
Texas Capital Bank is a bank headquartered in Dallas, Texas. The bank has branches located in every major city in Texas. Its parent bank holding company is Texas Capital Bancshares. It also operates an online-only banking division, Bask Bank.
AMBA vs CCBG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $108.5M | $63.5M |
| Net Profit | $-15.1M | $13.7M |
| Gross Margin | 59.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -15.0% | 29.3% |
| Net Margin | -13.9% | 21.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 31.2% | 6.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 37.2% | 4.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.35 | $0.80 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $108.5M | $63.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.5M | $65.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.9M | $63.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $84.0M | $61.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.7M | $59.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.7M | $59.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.5M | $58.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.6M | $56.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-15.1M | $13.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.0M | $15.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.3M | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.2M | $16.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-24.1M | $13.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.9M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.9M | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-60.6M | $12.6M |
| Q4 25 | 59.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 60.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -15.0% | 29.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.0% | 32.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.1% | 31.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.2% | 35.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.9% | 29.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -56.9% | 26.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -72.4% | 29.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -80.8% | 27.2% |
| Q4 25 | -13.9% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.9% | 24.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -28.3% | 23.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.1% | 27.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.1% | 21.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -54.8% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -69.6% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -117.4% | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.35 | $0.80 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.47 | $0.93 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.58 | $0.88 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.48 | $0.99 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.58 | $0.78 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.85 | $0.77 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.93 | $0.83 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.51 | $0.74 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $174.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $590.1M | $552.9M |
| Total Assets | $751.9M | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $174.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $142.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $144.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $131.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $590.1M | $552.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $576.5M | $540.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $572.7M | $526.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $561.4M | $512.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $554.3M | $495.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.6M | $476.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $555.4M | $461.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $559.9M | $448.3M |
| Q4 25 | $751.9M | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $706.4M | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $701.9M | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $689.0M | $4.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $670.8M | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $650.3M | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $638.7M | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $657.7M | $4.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $34.3M | $87.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.4M | $80.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 29.0% | 126.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 12.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 6.39× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $64.3M | $150.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.3M | $87.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5M | $21.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.8M | $32.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.4M | $21.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | $63.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.7M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.0M | $24.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $14.6M |
| Q4 25 | $31.4M | $80.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $19.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $30.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.2M | $19.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $54.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.2M | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.1M | $23.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.0M | $12.4M |
| Q4 25 | 29.0% | 126.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 30.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | 48.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.3% | 31.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 91.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | 17.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -29.5% | 39.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.6% | 22.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | 4.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.39× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.30× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.86× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.97× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.76× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.17× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMBA
| TW | $76.0M | 70% |
| Asia Pacific Other Than Taiwan | $20.2M | 19% |
| North America Other Than United States | $7.4M | 7% |
| Other | $5.0M | 5% |
CCBG
Segment breakdown not available.
