vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMBARELLA INC (AMBA) and Cricut, Inc. (CRCT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cricut, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($203.6M vs $108.5M, roughly 1.9× AMBARELLA INC). Cricut, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.8% vs -13.9%, a 17.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMBARELLA INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (31.2% vs -2.7%). Over the past eight quarters, AMBARELLA INC's revenue compounded faster (45.0% CAGR vs 10.3%).
Ambarella, Inc. is an American fabless semiconductor design company, focusing on low-power, high-definition (HD) and Ultra HD video compression, image processing, and computer vision processors. Ambarella's products are used in a wide variety of human and computer vision applications, including video security, advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), electronic mirror, drive recorder, driver and in-cabin monitoring, autonomous driving, and robotics applications. Ambarella's system on chips ...
Cricut, Inc. is an American brand of cutting plotters, or computer-controlled cutting machines, designed for home crafters. The machines are used for cutting paper, felt, vinyl, fabric and other materials such as leather, matboard, and wood.
AMBA vs CRCT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $108.5M | $203.6M |
| Net Profit | $-15.1M | $7.8M |
| Gross Margin | 59.6% | 47.4% |
| Operating Margin | -15.0% | 6.8% |
| Net Margin | -13.9% | 3.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 31.2% | -2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 37.2% | -34.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.35 | $0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $108.5M | $203.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.5M | $170.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.9M | $172.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $84.0M | $162.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.7M | $209.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.7M | $167.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.5M | $167.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.6M | $167.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-15.1M | $7.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.0M | $20.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.3M | $24.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.2M | $23.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-24.1M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.9M | $11.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.9M | $19.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-60.6M | $19.6M |
| Q4 25 | 59.6% | 47.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.9% | 55.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 60.0% | 59.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.0% | 60.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.6% | 44.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.8% | 46.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.9% | 53.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.8% | 54.7% |
| Q4 25 | -15.0% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.0% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.1% | 17.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.2% | 18.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.9% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -56.9% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -72.4% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -80.8% | 15.1% |
| Q4 25 | -13.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.9% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -28.3% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.1% | 14.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.1% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -54.8% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -69.6% | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -117.4% | 11.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.35 | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.47 | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.58 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.48 | $0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.58 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.85 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.93 | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.51 | $0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $174.1M | $275.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $590.1M | $343.6M |
| Total Assets | $751.9M | $580.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $174.1M | $275.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $142.7M | $207.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.3M | $376.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $144.6M | $356.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.1M | $336.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.9M | $246.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $131.8M | $299.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.9M | $281.7M |
| Q4 25 | $590.1M | $343.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $576.5M | $358.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $572.7M | $308.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $561.4M | $490.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $554.3M | $466.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.6M | $475.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $555.4M | $448.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $559.9M | $552.6M |
| Q4 25 | $751.9M | $580.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $706.4M | $564.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $701.9M | $721.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $689.0M | $681.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $670.8M | $693.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $650.3M | $663.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $638.7M | $742.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $657.7M | $723.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $34.3M | $82.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 29.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 10.58× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $64.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.3M | $82.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5M | $20.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.8M | $36.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.4M | $61.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | $103.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.7M | $70.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.0M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $56.7M |
| Q4 25 | $31.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 29.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -29.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.58× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.64× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.11× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.77× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.89× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMBA
| TW | $76.0M | 70% |
| Asia Pacific Other Than Taiwan | $20.2M | 19% |
| North America Other Than United States | $7.4M | 7% |
| Other | $5.0M | 5% |
CRCT
| Platform | $83.9M | 41% |
| Connected Machines | $65.2M | 32% |
| Accessories And Materials | $54.4M | 27% |
