vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMBARELLA INC (AMBA) and Employers Holdings, Inc. (EIG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Employers Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($170.5M vs $108.5M, roughly 1.6× AMBARELLA INC). On growth, AMBARELLA INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (31.2% vs -21.3%). Over the past eight quarters, AMBARELLA INC's revenue compounded faster (45.0% CAGR vs -11.4%).
Ambarella, Inc. is an American fabless semiconductor design company, focusing on low-power, high-definition (HD) and Ultra HD video compression, image processing, and computer vision processors. Ambarella's products are used in a wide variety of human and computer vision applications, including video security, advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), electronic mirror, drive recorder, driver and in-cabin monitoring, autonomous driving, and robotics applications. Ambarella's system on chips ...
Employers Holdings, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered insurance holding company that specializes in offering workers' compensation insurance and customized risk management services primarily for small and medium-sized enterprises across the United States. It mainly serves clients in low-to-medium hazard industries, helping them mitigate workplace safety risks and meet relevant regulatory requirements for employee protection.
AMBA vs EIG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $108.5M | $170.5M |
| Net Profit | $-15.1M | — |
| Gross Margin | 59.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -15.0% | — |
| Net Margin | -13.9% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 31.2% | -21.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 37.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.35 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $170.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $108.5M | $188.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.5M | $239.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.9M | $246.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $84.0M | $202.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.7M | $216.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.7M | $224.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.5M | $217.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-15.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.0M | $-8.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.3M | $29.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.2M | $12.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-24.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.9M | $30.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.9M | $31.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 59.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 60.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -15.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.0% | -4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.1% | 15.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.2% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -56.9% | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -72.4% | 18.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -13.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.9% | -3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -28.3% | 12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.1% | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -54.8% | 13.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -69.6% | 14.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.35 | $-0.93 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.47 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.58 | $1.23 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.48 | $0.52 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.58 | $1.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.85 | $1.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.93 | $1.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $174.1M | $169.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $590.1M | $955.7M |
| Total Assets | $751.9M | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $169.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $174.1M | $169.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $142.7M | $172.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.3M | $78.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $144.6M | $100.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.1M | $68.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.9M | $173.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $131.8M | $126.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $19.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $955.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $590.1M | $955.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $576.5M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $572.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $561.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $554.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $555.4M | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $751.9M | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $706.4M | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $701.9M | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $689.0M | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $670.8M | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $650.3M | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $638.7M | $3.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $34.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 29.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $64.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.3M | $44.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5M | $29.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.8M | $0 | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.4M | $14.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | $76.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.7M | $51.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.0M | $11.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $31.4M | $44.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $76.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 29.0% | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 35.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -29.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.37× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMBA
| TW | $76.0M | 70% |
| Asia Pacific Other Than Taiwan | $20.2M | 19% |
| North America Other Than United States | $7.4M | 7% |
| Other | $5.0M | 5% |
EIG
Segment breakdown not available.
