vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMBARELLA INC (AMBA) and FLYEXCLUSIVE INC. (FLYX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMBARELLA INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($108.5M vs $92.1M, roughly 1.2× FLYEXCLUSIVE INC.). FLYEXCLUSIVE INC. runs the higher net margin — -4.6% vs -13.9%, a 9.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMBARELLA INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (31.2% vs 19.8%). AMBARELLA INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($31.4M vs $-11.0M). Over the past eight quarters, AMBARELLA INC's revenue compounded faster (45.0% CAGR vs 21.9%).
Ambarella, Inc. is an American fabless semiconductor design company, focusing on low-power, high-definition (HD) and Ultra HD video compression, image processing, and computer vision processors. Ambarella's products are used in a wide variety of human and computer vision applications, including video security, advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), electronic mirror, drive recorder, driver and in-cabin monitoring, autonomous driving, and robotics applications. Ambarella's system on chips ...
FLYEXCLUSIVE INC. is a U.S.-headquartered private aviation services provider that offers private jet charter, aircraft management, maintenance repair, and fractional ownership programs. It primarily serves high-net-worth individuals, corporate clients, and government entities across North America, delivering personalized on-demand air travel solutions prioritizing safety and convenience.
AMBA vs FLYX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $108.5M | $92.1M |
| Net Profit | $-15.1M | $-4.3M |
| Gross Margin | 59.6% | 13.7% |
| Operating Margin | -15.0% | -12.3% |
| Net Margin | -13.9% | -4.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 31.2% | 19.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 37.2% | 32.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.35 | $-0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $108.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.5M | $92.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.9M | $91.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $84.0M | $88.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.7M | $76.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.5M | $79.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.6M | $80.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-15.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.0M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.3M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.2M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-24.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.9M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.9M | $-5.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-60.6M | $-5.8M |
| Q4 25 | 59.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.9% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 60.0% | 15.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.0% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.8% | 11.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.9% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.8% | 7.2% |
| Q4 25 | -15.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.0% | -12.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.1% | -13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.2% | -16.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -56.9% | -27.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -72.4% | -27.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -80.8% | -34.3% |
| Q4 25 | -13.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.9% | -4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -28.3% | -5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.1% | -6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -54.8% | -8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -69.6% | -6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -117.4% | -7.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.35 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.47 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.58 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.48 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.58 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.85 | $-0.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.93 | $-0.32 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.51 | $-0.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $174.1M | $18.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $123.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $590.1M | $-434.2M |
| Total Assets | $751.9M | $448.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $174.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $142.7M | $18.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.3M | $15.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $144.6M | $14.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.9M | $18.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $131.8M | $9.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.9M | $5.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $123.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $111.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $121.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $197.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $206.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $209.4M |
| Q4 25 | $590.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $576.5M | $-434.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $572.7M | $-261.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $561.4M | $-281.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $554.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.6M | $-192.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $555.4M | $-149.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $559.9M | $-149.5M |
| Q4 25 | $751.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $706.4M | $448.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $701.9M | $443.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $689.0M | $466.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $670.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $650.3M | $487.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $638.7M | $494.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $657.7M | $524.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $34.3M | $-209.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.4M | $-11.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 29.0% | -12.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 11.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $64.3M | $-51.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5M | $-209.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.8M | $363.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.4M | $-10.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.7M | $-12.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.0M | $-16.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $-26.0M |
| Q4 25 | $31.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $353.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.2M | $-14.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.2M | $-25.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.1M | $-26.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.0M | $-64.5M |
| Q4 25 | 29.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | -12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.3% | -16.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | -33.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -29.5% | -33.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.6% | -80.6% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 11.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 17.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | 48.2% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMBA
| TW | $76.0M | 70% |
| Asia Pacific Other Than Taiwan | $20.2M | 19% |
| North America Other Than United States | $7.4M | 7% |
| Other | $5.0M | 5% |
FLYX
Segment breakdown not available.
