vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMBARELLA INC (AMBA) and FARMERS NATIONAL BANC CORP (FMNB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMBARELLA INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($108.5M vs $71.5M, roughly 1.5× FARMERS NATIONAL BANC CORP). FARMERS NATIONAL BANC CORP runs the higher net margin — 20.5% vs -13.9%, a 34.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMBARELLA INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (31.2% vs 3.2%). FARMERS NATIONAL BANC CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($52.2M vs $31.4M). Over the past eight quarters, AMBARELLA INC's revenue compounded faster (45.0% CAGR vs 6.2%).
Ambarella, Inc. is an American fabless semiconductor design company, focusing on low-power, high-definition (HD) and Ultra HD video compression, image processing, and computer vision processors. Ambarella's products are used in a wide variety of human and computer vision applications, including video security, advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), electronic mirror, drive recorder, driver and in-cabin monitoring, autonomous driving, and robotics applications. Ambarella's system on chips ...
Farmers National Banc Corp (OH) is a regional financial holding company based in Ohio, the United States. It offers full-spectrum retail and commercial banking products, wealth management solutions, and insurance services, primarily catering to individual consumers, small and medium-sized enterprises, and local community clients in Ohio and adjacent Midwestern U.S. regions.
AMBA vs FMNB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $108.5M | $71.5M |
| Net Profit | $-15.1M | $14.6M |
| Gross Margin | 59.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -15.0% | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | -13.9% | 20.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 31.2% | 3.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 37.2% | 1.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.35 | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $108.5M | $71.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.5M | $70.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.9M | $69.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $84.0M | $67.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.7M | $69.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.7M | $70.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.5M | $66.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.6M | $63.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-15.1M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.0M | $12.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.3M | $13.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.2M | $13.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-24.1M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.9M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.9M | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-60.6M | $11.2M |
| Q4 25 | 59.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 60.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -15.0% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.0% | 20.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.1% | 23.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.2% | 24.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.9% | 25.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -56.9% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -72.4% | 21.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -80.8% | 21.2% |
| Q4 25 | -13.9% | 20.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.9% | 17.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -28.3% | 19.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.1% | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.1% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -54.8% | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -69.6% | 17.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -117.4% | 17.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.35 | $0.39 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.47 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.58 | $0.37 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.48 | $0.36 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.58 | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.85 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.93 | $0.31 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.51 | $0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $174.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $86.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $590.1M | $485.7M |
| Total Assets | $751.9M | $5.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.18× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $174.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $142.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $144.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $131.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $86.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $86.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $86.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $86.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $86.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $86.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $88.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $88.8M |
| Q4 25 | $590.1M | $485.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $576.5M | $465.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $572.7M | $437.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $561.4M | $429.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $554.3M | $406.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.6M | $439.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $555.4M | $396.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $559.9M | $397.0M |
| Q4 25 | $751.9M | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $706.4M | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $701.9M | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $689.0M | $5.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $670.8M | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $650.3M | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $638.7M | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $657.7M | $5.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.22× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $34.3M | $60.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.4M | $52.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 29.0% | 73.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 11.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.10× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $64.3M | $85.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.3M | $60.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5M | $10.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.8M | $14.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.4M | $15.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | $66.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.7M | $23.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.0M | $16.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $13.7M |
| Q4 25 | $31.4M | $52.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $9.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $12.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.2M | $12.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $54.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.2M | $20.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.1M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.0M | $12.2M |
| Q4 25 | 29.0% | 73.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 12.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | 17.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.3% | 18.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 79.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | 29.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -29.5% | 21.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.6% | 19.2% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 5.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 16.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | 2.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.01× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.80× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.22× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMBA
| TW | $76.0M | 70% |
| Asia Pacific Other Than Taiwan | $20.2M | 19% |
| North America Other Than United States | $7.4M | 7% |
| Other | $5.0M | 5% |
FMNB
Segment breakdown not available.
