vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMBARELLA INC (AMBA) and HANMI FINANCIAL CORP (HAFC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMBARELLA INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($108.5M vs $71.2M, roughly 1.5× HANMI FINANCIAL CORP). HANMI FINANCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs -13.9%, a 43.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMBARELLA INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (31.2% vs 17.1%). HANMI FINANCIAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($203.7M vs $31.4M). Over the past eight quarters, AMBARELLA INC's revenue compounded faster (45.0% CAGR vs 10.4%).
Ambarella, Inc. is an American fabless semiconductor design company, focusing on low-power, high-definition (HD) and Ultra HD video compression, image processing, and computer vision processors. Ambarella's products are used in a wide variety of human and computer vision applications, including video security, advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), electronic mirror, drive recorder, driver and in-cabin monitoring, autonomous driving, and robotics applications. Ambarella's system on chips ...
Hanmi Bank Corporation is a community bank headquartered in Los Angeles, California, with 35 branches and eight loan production offices in California, Texas, Illinois, New York, New Jersey and Virginia.
AMBA vs HAFC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $108.5M | $71.2M |
| Net Profit | $-15.1M | $21.2M |
| Gross Margin | 59.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -15.0% | 29.8% |
| Net Margin | -13.9% | 29.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 31.2% | 17.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 37.2% | 20.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.35 | $0.70 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $108.5M | $71.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.5M | $71.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.9M | $65.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $84.0M | $62.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.7M | $60.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.7M | $58.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.5M | $56.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.6M | $58.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-15.1M | $21.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.0M | $22.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.3M | $15.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.2M | $17.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-24.1M | $17.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.9M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.9M | $14.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-60.6M | $15.2M |
| Q4 25 | 59.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 60.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -15.0% | 29.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.0% | 31.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.1% | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.2% | 28.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.9% | 29.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -56.9% | 25.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -72.4% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -80.8% | 26.0% |
| Q4 25 | -13.9% | 29.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.9% | 31.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -28.3% | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.1% | 28.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.1% | 29.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -54.8% | 25.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -69.6% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -117.4% | 26.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.35 | $0.70 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.47 | $0.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.58 | $0.50 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.48 | $0.58 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.58 | $0.58 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.85 | $0.49 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.93 | $0.48 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.51 | $0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $174.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $590.1M | $796.4M |
| Total Assets | $751.9M | $7.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $174.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $142.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $144.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $131.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $590.1M | $796.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $576.5M | $779.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $572.7M | $762.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $561.4M | $751.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $554.3M | $732.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.6M | $736.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $555.4M | $707.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $559.9M | $703.1M |
| Q4 25 | $751.9M | $7.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $706.4M | $7.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $701.9M | $7.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $689.0M | $7.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $670.8M | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $650.3M | $7.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $638.7M | $7.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $657.7M | $7.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $34.3M | $206.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.4M | $203.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 29.0% | 286.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 9.70× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $64.3M | $356.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.3M | $206.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5M | $146.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.8M | $-19.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.4M | $25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | $52.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.7M | $6.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.0M | $2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $30.0M |
| Q4 25 | $31.4M | $203.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $146.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $-19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.2M | $25.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $49.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.2M | $6.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.1M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.0M | $29.2M |
| Q4 25 | 29.0% | 286.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 206.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.3% | 40.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 82.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -29.5% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.6% | 50.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.97× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.45× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.98× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMBA
| TW | $76.0M | 70% |
| Asia Pacific Other Than Taiwan | $20.2M | 19% |
| North America Other Than United States | $7.4M | 7% |
| Other | $5.0M | 5% |
HAFC
Segment breakdown not available.