vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMBARELLA INC (AMBA) and Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hippo Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($120.4M vs $108.5M, roughly 1.1× AMBARELLA INC). Hippo Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs -13.9%, a 18.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMBARELLA INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (31.2% vs 18.2%). AMBARELLA INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($31.4M vs $9.1M). Over the past eight quarters, AMBARELLA INC's revenue compounded faster (45.0% CAGR vs 18.9%).
Ambarella, Inc. is an American fabless semiconductor design company, focusing on low-power, high-definition (HD) and Ultra HD video compression, image processing, and computer vision processors. Ambarella's products are used in a wide variety of human and computer vision applications, including video security, advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), electronic mirror, drive recorder, driver and in-cabin monitoring, autonomous driving, and robotics applications. Ambarella's system on chips ...
Hippo Valley Estate is a sugar estate found near the town of Chiredzi in Chiredzi District of southeastern Zimbabwe, on the Runde River near the border with Mozambique.
AMBA vs HIPO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $108.5M | $120.4M |
| Net Profit | $-15.1M | $6.0M |
| Gross Margin | 59.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -15.0% | 5.6% |
| Net Margin | -13.9% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 31.2% | 18.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 37.2% | -86.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.35 | $0.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $108.5M | $120.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.5M | $120.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.9M | $117.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $84.0M | $110.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.7M | $101.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.7M | $95.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.5M | $89.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.6M | $85.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-15.1M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.0M | $98.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.3M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.2M | $-47.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-24.1M | $44.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.9M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.9M | $-40.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-60.6M | $-35.7M |
| Q4 25 | 59.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 60.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -15.0% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.0% | 81.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.2% | -41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.9% | 46.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -56.9% | -5.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -72.4% | -40.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -80.8% | -38.7% |
| Q4 25 | -13.9% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.9% | 81.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -28.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.1% | -43.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.1% | 43.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -54.8% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -69.6% | -45.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -117.4% | -42.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.35 | $0.31 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.47 | $3.77 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.58 | $0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.48 | $-1.91 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.58 | $1.81 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.85 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.93 | $-1.64 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.51 | $-1.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $174.1M | $218.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $590.1M | $436.1M |
| Total Assets | $751.9M | $1.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $174.1M | $218.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $142.7M | $247.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.3M | $198.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $144.6M | $140.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.1M | $197.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.9M | $191.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $131.8M | $175.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.9M | $223.4M |
| Q4 25 | $590.1M | $436.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $576.5M | $421.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $572.7M | $332.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $561.4M | $322.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $554.3M | $362.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.6M | $326.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $555.4M | $322.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $559.9M | $351.2M |
| Q4 25 | $751.9M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $706.4M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $701.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $689.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $670.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $650.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $638.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $657.7M | $1.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $34.3M | $9.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.4M | $9.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 29.0% | 7.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $64.3M | $14.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.3M | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5M | $16.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.8M | $24.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.4M | $-35.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | $47.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.7M | $46.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.0M | $-10.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $17.7M |
| Q4 25 | $31.4M | $9.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $16.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $24.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.2M | $-35.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $47.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.1M | $-10.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.0M | $17.6M |
| Q4 25 | 29.0% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.3% | -32.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 46.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -29.5% | -11.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.6% | 20.7% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMBA
| TW | $76.0M | 70% |
| Asia Pacific Other Than Taiwan | $20.2M | 19% |
| North America Other Than United States | $7.4M | 7% |
| Other | $5.0M | 5% |
HIPO
Segment breakdown not available.
