vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN COASTAL INSURANCE Corp (ACIC) and Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hippo Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($120.4M vs $86.4M, roughly 1.4× AMERICAN COASTAL INSURANCE Corp). AMERICAN COASTAL INSURANCE Corp runs the higher net margin — 30.8% vs 5.0%, a 25.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hippo Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.2% vs 9.0%). AMERICAN COASTAL INSURANCE Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($70.9M vs $9.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Hippo Holdings Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (18.9% CAGR vs 13.9%).
United Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Inc. is an American property and casualty insurance company with headquarters in Florida. It writes commercial, residential, homeowners’, and flood insurance policies in several coastal states.
Hippo Valley Estate is a sugar estate found near the town of Chiredzi in Chiredzi District of southeastern Zimbabwe, on the Runde River near the border with Mozambique.
ACIC vs HIPO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $86.4M | $120.4M |
| Net Profit | $26.6M | $6.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 43.2% | 5.6% |
| Net Margin | 30.8% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.0% | 18.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 437.1% | -86.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.54 | $0.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $86.4M | $120.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $90.4M | $120.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.5M | $117.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.2M | $110.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.3M | $101.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.1M | $95.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $68.7M | $89.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $66.6M | $85.1M |
| Q4 25 | $26.6M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.5M | $98.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.4M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.3M | $-47.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.9M | $44.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.1M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $-40.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.6M | $-35.7M |
| Q4 25 | 43.2% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 46.1% | 81.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.8% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.8% | -41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 46.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.9% | -5.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.1% | -40.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.9% | -38.7% |
| Q4 25 | 30.8% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.9% | 81.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.6% | -43.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 43.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.2% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.8% | -45.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.4% | -42.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.54 | $0.31 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.65 | $3.77 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.53 | $0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.43 | $-1.91 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.10 | $1.81 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.39 | $-1.64 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.48 | $-1.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $198.8M | $218.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $150.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $317.6M | $436.1M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $1.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.47× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $198.8M | $218.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $267.9M | $247.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $315.5M | $198.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $167.2M | $140.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $137.0M | $197.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $183.1M | $191.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $229.4M | $175.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $285.4M | $223.4M |
| Q4 25 | $150.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $150.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $317.6M | $436.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $327.2M | $421.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $292.3M | $332.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $260.9M | $322.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $235.7M | $362.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $259.6M | $326.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $223.1M | $322.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $204.0M | $351.2M |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $71.0M | $9.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $70.9M | $9.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 82.0% | 7.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.67× | 1.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $14.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $71.0M | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-35.6M | $16.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $127.9M | $24.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.4M | $-35.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $243.5M | $47.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $46.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.4M | $-10.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $124.5M | $17.7M |
| Q4 25 | $70.9M | $9.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $16.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $24.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.3M | $-35.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $243.5M | $47.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-10.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $17.6M |
| Q4 25 | 82.0% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.5% | -32.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 307.2% | 46.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -11.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 20.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | 2.67× | 1.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.10× | 0.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.84× | 19.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.24× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.23× | 1.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.32× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.63× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.27× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
