vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMBARELLA INC (AMBA) and J.Jill, Inc. (JILL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
J.Jill, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($150.5M vs $108.5M, roughly 1.4× AMBARELLA INC). J.Jill, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 6.1% vs -13.9%, a 20.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMBARELLA INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (31.2% vs -0.5%). AMBARELLA INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($31.4M vs $16.0M). Over the past eight quarters, AMBARELLA INC's revenue compounded faster (45.0% CAGR vs 0.1%).
Ambarella, Inc. is an American fabless semiconductor design company, focusing on low-power, high-definition (HD) and Ultra HD video compression, image processing, and computer vision processors. Ambarella's products are used in a wide variety of human and computer vision applications, including video security, advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), electronic mirror, drive recorder, driver and in-cabin monitoring, autonomous driving, and robotics applications. Ambarella's system on chips ...
J.Jill is an American womenswear retailer founded in 1955 in Massachusetts. It has been a publicly traded company since 2017. J.Jill is headquartered in Quincy, Massachusetts.
AMBA vs JILL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $108.5M | $150.5M |
| Net Profit | $-15.1M | $9.2M |
| Gross Margin | 59.6% | 70.9% |
| Operating Margin | -15.0% | 9.9% |
| Net Margin | -13.9% | 6.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 31.2% | -0.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 37.2% | -25.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.35 | $0.60 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $108.5M | $150.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.5M | $154.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.9M | $153.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $84.0M | $142.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.7M | $151.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.7M | $155.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.5M | $161.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.6M | $150.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-15.1M | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.0M | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.3M | $11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.2M | $2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-24.1M | $12.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.9M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.9M | $16.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-60.6M | $4.8M |
| Q4 25 | 59.6% | 70.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.9% | 68.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 60.0% | 71.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.0% | 66.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.6% | 71.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.8% | 70.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.9% | 72.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.8% | 67.5% |
| Q4 25 | -15.0% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.0% | 10.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.1% | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.2% | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.9% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -56.9% | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -72.4% | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -80.8% | 7.0% |
| Q4 25 | -13.9% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.9% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -28.3% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.1% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.1% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -54.8% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -69.6% | 10.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -117.4% | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.35 | $0.60 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.47 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.58 | $0.76 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.48 | $0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.58 | $0.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.85 | $0.54 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.93 | $1.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.51 | $0.33 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $174.1M | $58.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $590.1M | $129.0M |
| Total Assets | $751.9M | $458.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $174.1M | $58.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $142.7M | $45.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.3M | $31.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $144.6M | $35.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.1M | $38.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.9M | $28.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $131.8M | $77.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.9M | $62.2M |
| Q4 25 | $590.1M | $129.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $576.5M | $121.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $572.7M | $112.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $561.4M | $105.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $554.3M | $103.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.6M | $90.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $555.4M | $53.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $559.9M | $37.2M |
| Q4 25 | $751.9M | $458.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $706.4M | $436.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $701.9M | $432.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $689.0M | $417.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $670.8M | $418.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $650.3M | $390.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $638.7M | $443.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $657.7M | $428.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $34.3M | $19.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.4M | $16.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 29.0% | 10.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.07× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $64.3M | $37.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.3M | $19.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5M | $19.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.8M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.4M | $8.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | $19.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.7M | $16.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.0M | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $6.6M |
| Q4 25 | $31.4M | $16.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $17.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.2M | $1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.2M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.1M | $19.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.0M | $1.8M |
| Q4 25 | 29.0% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.3% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -29.5% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.6% | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.84× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.00× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.39× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMBA
| TW | $76.0M | 70% |
| Asia Pacific Other Than Taiwan | $20.2M | 19% |
| North America Other Than United States | $7.4M | 7% |
| Other | $5.0M | 5% |
JILL
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $80.1M | 53% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $70.5M | 47% |
