vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMBARELLA INC (AMBA) and Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ramaco Resources, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($121.0M vs $108.5M, roughly 1.1× AMBARELLA INC). Ramaco Resources, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -11.0% vs -13.9%, a 2.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMBARELLA INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (31.2% vs -27.7%). AMBARELLA INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($31.4M vs $-17.5M). Over the past eight quarters, AMBARELLA INC's revenue compounded faster (45.0% CAGR vs -22.7%).
Ambarella, Inc. is an American fabless semiconductor design company, focusing on low-power, high-definition (HD) and Ultra HD video compression, image processing, and computer vision processors. Ambarella's products are used in a wide variety of human and computer vision applications, including video security, advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), electronic mirror, drive recorder, driver and in-cabin monitoring, autonomous driving, and robotics applications. Ambarella's system on chips ...
Ramaco Resources, Inc. is a U.S.-based mining company focused on high-grade metallurgical coal production. It operates mining assets across the Appalachian region, supplying products to global steel manufacturing and industrial clients, with core operations centered on sustainable low-cost metallurgical coal extraction and distribution.
AMBA vs METC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $108.5M | $121.0M |
| Net Profit | $-15.1M | $-13.3M |
| Gross Margin | 59.6% | 15.8% |
| Operating Margin | -15.0% | -12.0% |
| Net Margin | -13.9% | -11.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 31.2% | -27.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 37.2% | -5468.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.35 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $108.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.5M | $121.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.9M | $153.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $84.0M | $134.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.7M | $170.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.7M | $167.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.5M | $155.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.6M | $172.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-15.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.0M | $-13.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.3M | $-14.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.2M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-24.1M | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.9M | $-239.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.9M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-60.6M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | 59.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.9% | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 60.0% | 12.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.0% | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.6% | 20.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.8% | 19.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.9% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.8% | 19.1% |
| Q4 25 | -15.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.0% | -12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.1% | -9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.2% | -8.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.9% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -56.9% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -72.4% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -80.8% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | -13.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.9% | -11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -28.3% | -9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.1% | -7.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -54.8% | -0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -69.6% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -117.4% | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.35 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.47 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.58 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.48 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.58 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.85 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.93 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.51 | $0.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $174.1M | $193.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $116.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $590.1M | $526.9M |
| Total Assets | $751.9M | $849.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.22× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $174.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $142.7M | $193.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.3M | $28.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $144.6M | $43.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.1M | $33.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.9M | $22.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $131.8M | $27.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.9M | $30.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $116.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $88.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $590.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $576.5M | $526.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $572.7M | $347.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $561.4M | $355.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $554.3M | $362.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.6M | $361.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $555.4M | $366.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $559.9M | $372.3M |
| Q4 25 | $751.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $706.4M | $849.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $701.9M | $674.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $689.0M | $685.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $670.8M | $674.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $650.3M | $645.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $638.7M | $659.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $657.7M | $674.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $34.3M | $-1.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.4M | $-17.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 29.0% | -14.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 13.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $64.3M | $-24.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.8M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.4M | $26.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | $15.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.7M | $37.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.0M | $34.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $25.2M |
| Q4 25 | $31.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $-17.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $-19.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.2M | $7.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.2M | $25.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.1M | $20.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.0M | $6.5M |
| Q4 25 | 29.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | -14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | -13.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.3% | 5.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -29.5% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.6% | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 10.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | 10.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.21× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.40× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMBA
| TW | $76.0M | 70% |
| Asia Pacific Other Than Taiwan | $20.2M | 19% |
| North America Other Than United States | $7.4M | 7% |
| Other | $5.0M | 5% |
METC
| Export Coal Revenues | $73.0M | 60% |
| Domestic Coal Revenues | $48.0M | 40% |