vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMBARELLA INC (AMBA) and PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP (PGC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMBARELLA INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($108.5M vs $78.2M, roughly 1.4× PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP). PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs -13.9%, a 29.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMBARELLA INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (31.2% vs 26.5%). AMBARELLA INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($31.4M vs $28.8M). Over the past eight quarters, AMBARELLA INC's revenue compounded faster (45.0% CAGR vs 21.4%).
Ambarella, Inc. is an American fabless semiconductor design company, focusing on low-power, high-definition (HD) and Ultra HD video compression, image processing, and computer vision processors. Ambarella's products are used in a wide variety of human and computer vision applications, including video security, advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), electronic mirror, drive recorder, driver and in-cabin monitoring, autonomous driving, and robotics applications. Ambarella's system on chips ...
Peapack Gladstone Financial Corp is a U.S.-based regional financial holding company that provides commercial and consumer banking, wealth management, private banking, lending solutions, and trust services, primarily serving individual and small-to-medium business clients across New Jersey and the surrounding U.S. Northeast region.
AMBA vs PGC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $108.5M | $78.2M |
| Net Profit | $-15.1M | $12.2M |
| Gross Margin | 59.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -15.0% | 21.7% |
| Net Margin | -13.9% | 15.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 31.2% | 26.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 37.2% | 31.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.35 | $0.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $108.5M | $78.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.5M | $70.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.9M | $69.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $84.0M | $64.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.7M | $61.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.7M | $56.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.5M | $56.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.6M | $53.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-15.1M | $12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.0M | $9.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.3M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.2M | $7.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-24.1M | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.9M | $7.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.9M | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-60.6M | $8.6M |
| Q4 25 | 59.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 60.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -15.0% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.0% | 19.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.1% | 16.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.2% | 16.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.9% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -56.9% | 19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -72.4% | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -80.8% | 23.4% |
| Q4 25 | -13.9% | 15.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.9% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -28.3% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.1% | 11.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.1% | 14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -54.8% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -69.6% | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -117.4% | 16.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.35 | $0.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.47 | $0.54 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.58 | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.48 | $0.43 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.58 | $0.52 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.85 | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.93 | $0.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.51 | $0.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $174.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $590.1M | $658.2M |
| Total Assets | $751.9M | $7.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $174.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $142.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $144.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $131.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $590.1M | $658.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $576.5M | $642.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $572.7M | $629.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $561.4M | $621.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $554.3M | $605.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.6M | $607.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $555.4M | $588.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $559.9M | $582.4M |
| Q4 25 | $751.9M | $7.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $706.4M | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $701.9M | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $689.0M | $7.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $670.8M | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $650.3M | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $638.7M | $6.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $657.7M | $6.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $34.3M | $43.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.4M | $28.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 29.0% | 36.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 18.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $64.3M | $61.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.3M | $43.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5M | $36.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.8M | $15.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.4M | $-7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | $71.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.7M | $24.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.0M | $852.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $19.1M |
| Q4 25 | $31.4M | $28.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.2M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.2M | $23.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.1M | $-431.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.0M | $18.0M |
| Q4 25 | 29.0% | 36.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 48.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.3% | -17.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 101.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | 40.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -29.5% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.6% | 33.9% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 18.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 5.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | 2.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.55× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.76× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.01× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.25× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.21× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMBA
| TW | $76.0M | 70% |
| Asia Pacific Other Than Taiwan | $20.2M | 19% |
| North America Other Than United States | $7.4M | 7% |
| Other | $5.0M | 5% |
PGC
| Banking Segment | $61.4M | 79% |
| Wealth Management Division | $13.9M | 18% |
| Other | $2.9M | 4% |
