vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMBARELLA INC (AMBA) and RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. (RMAX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMBARELLA INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($108.5M vs $71.1M, roughly 1.5× RE/MAX Holdings, Inc.). RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 2.0% vs -13.9%, a 16.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMBARELLA INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (31.2% vs -1.8%). RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($33.5M vs $31.4M). Over the past eight quarters, AMBARELLA INC's revenue compounded faster (45.0% CAGR vs -4.7%).
Ambarella, Inc. is an American fabless semiconductor design company, focusing on low-power, high-definition (HD) and Ultra HD video compression, image processing, and computer vision processors. Ambarella's products are used in a wide variety of human and computer vision applications, including video security, advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), electronic mirror, drive recorder, driver and in-cabin monitoring, autonomous driving, and robotics applications. Ambarella's system on chips ...
RE/MAX is an international real estate franchise operating in over 100 countries and territories that, in 2015, had over 100,000 agents in 6,800 offices.
AMBA vs RMAX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $108.5M | $71.1M |
| Net Profit | $-15.1M | $1.4M |
| Gross Margin | 59.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -15.0% | 13.1% |
| Net Margin | -13.9% | 2.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 31.2% | -1.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 37.2% | -75.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.35 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $108.5M | $71.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.5M | $73.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.9M | $72.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $84.0M | $74.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.7M | $72.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.7M | $78.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.5M | $78.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.6M | $78.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-15.1M | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.0M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.3M | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.2M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-24.1M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.9M | $966.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.9M | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-60.6M | $-3.4M |
| Q4 25 | 59.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 60.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -15.0% | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.0% | 25.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.1% | 19.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.2% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.9% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -56.9% | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -72.4% | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -80.8% | 5.8% |
| Q4 25 | -13.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.9% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -28.3% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.1% | -2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.1% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -54.8% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -69.6% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -117.4% | -4.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.35 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.47 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.58 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.48 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.58 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.85 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.93 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.51 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $174.1M | $118.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $432.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $590.1M | $452.4M |
| Total Assets | $751.9M | $582.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.96× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $174.1M | $118.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $142.7M | $107.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.3M | $94.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $144.6M | $89.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.1M | $96.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.9M | $83.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $131.8M | $66.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.9M | $82.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $432.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $433.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $434.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $435.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $436.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $437.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $438.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $439.0M |
| Q4 25 | $590.1M | $452.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $576.5M | $448.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $572.7M | $442.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $561.4M | $433.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $554.3M | $429.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.6M | $423.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $555.4M | $418.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $559.9M | $412.0M |
| Q4 25 | $751.9M | $582.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $706.4M | $582.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $701.9M | $574.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $689.0M | $571.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $670.8M | $581.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $650.3M | $578.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $638.7M | $571.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $657.7M | $566.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.96× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.97× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.07× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $34.3M | $40.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.4M | $33.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 29.0% | 47.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 10.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 28.39× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $64.3M | $56.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.3M | $40.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5M | $17.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.8M | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.4M | $5.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | $59.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.7M | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.0M | $15.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $9.4M |
| Q4 25 | $31.4M | $33.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $16.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.2M | $4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $53.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.2M | $16.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.1M | $14.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.0M | $6.8M |
| Q4 25 | 29.0% | 47.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 22.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.3% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 73.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -29.5% | 17.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.6% | 8.6% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 9.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | 3.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 28.39× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.97× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.28× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.22× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.29× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMBA
| TW | $76.0M | 70% |
| Asia Pacific Other Than Taiwan | $20.2M | 19% |
| North America Other Than United States | $7.4M | 7% |
| Other | $5.0M | 5% |
RMAX
| Franchising Segment | $50.1M | 70% |
| Broker Fees | $13.9M | 20% |
| Annual Dues | $7.4M | 10% |