vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ambow Education Holding Ltd. (AMBO) and EyePoint, Inc. (EYPT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EyePoint, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.3M vs $2.8M, roughly 1.9× Ambow Education Holding Ltd.). Ambow Education Holding Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 64.2% vs -1114.3%, a 1178.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ambow Education Holding Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.3% vs -43.7%).
Ambow Education Holding Ltd. is a China-focused education service provider that offers personalized learning solutions, professional career training programs, and K-12 after-school tutoring services. It partners with educational institutions and enterprises to deliver technology-integrated learning resources for learners of all age groups across mainland China.
EyePoint Pharmaceuticals Inc. is a Watertown, Massachusetts company specialising in the application of microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) and nanotechnology to drug delivery.
AMBO vs EYPT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.8M | $5.3M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $-59.4M |
| Gross Margin | 53.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.9% | -1166.8% |
| Net Margin | 64.2% | -1114.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.3% | -43.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1343.1% | -92.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $-0.85 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $24.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | $9.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $14.0M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $15.2M |
| Q2 25 | $1.8M | $-59.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-45.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-29.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.0K | $-30.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-29.3M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-14.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-12.6M |
| Q2 25 | 53.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 93.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.6% | 85.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 93.5% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 92.1% |
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | -1166.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -199.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -390.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -311.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | -364.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -285.2% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -116.6% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -94.7% |
| Q2 25 | 64.2% | -1114.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -184.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -357.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -279.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | -325.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -250.6% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -100.5% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -83.0% |
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | $-0.85 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.65 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.54 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | $-0.58 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.55 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-0.32 | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-0.33 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.1M | $255.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.6M | $246.0M |
| Total Assets | $23.2M | $301.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $255.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $318.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $370.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $253.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $280.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $299.3M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $331.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $136.0M |
| Q2 25 | $8.6M | $246.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $298.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $336.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $218.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6M | $228.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $249.9M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $266.3M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $58.6M |
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $301.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $362.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $418.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $300.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.6M | $324.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $329.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $355.2M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $160.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-62.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-63.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -1196.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 22.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-194.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | — | $-62.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-53.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-35.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-39.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-20.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-31.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-23.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-15.2M |
| Q2 25 | — | $-63.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-53.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-36.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-40.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-21.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-32.4M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-24.0M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-16.9M |
| Q2 25 | — | -1196.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -218.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -312.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -385.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -222.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -277.0% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -171.0% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -111.3% |
| Q2 25 | — | 22.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.2% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 11.3% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
