vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Ambow Education Holding Ltd. (AMBO) and 17 Education & Technology Group Inc. (YQ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Ambow Education Holding Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.8M vs $1.2M, roughly 2.4× 17 Education & Technology Group Inc.). Ambow Education Holding Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 64.2% vs -29.2%, a 93.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.

Ambow Education Holding Ltd. is a China-focused education service provider that offers personalized learning solutions, professional career training programs, and K-12 after-school tutoring services. It partners with educational institutions and enterprises to deliver technology-integrated learning resources for learners of all age groups across mainland China.

McGraw Hill, Inc. is an American education science company that provides educational content, software, and services for students and educators across various levels—from K-12 to higher education and professional settings. They produce textbooks, digital learning tools, and adaptive technology to enhance learning experiences and outcomes. It is one of the "big three" educational publishers along with Houghton Mifflin Harcourt and Pearson Education. McGraw Hill also publishes reference and tra...

AMBO vs YQ — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
AMBO
AMBO
2.4× larger
AMBO
$2.8M
$1.2M
YQ
Higher net margin
AMBO
AMBO
93.4% more per $
AMBO
64.2%
-29.2%
YQ

Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2024

Metric
AMBO
AMBO
YQ
YQ
Revenue
$2.8M
$1.2M
Net Profit
$1.8M
$-342.2K
Gross Margin
53.3%
60.9%
Operating Margin
11.9%
-36.3%
Net Margin
64.2%
-29.2%
Revenue YoY
15.3%
Net Profit YoY
1343.1%
EPS (diluted)
$0.03

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
AMBO
AMBO
YQ
YQ
Q2 25
$2.8M
Q3 24
$1.2M
Q2 24
$2.4M
$1.3M
Q3 23
$853.0K
Q2 23
$2.7M
$1.3M
Q3 22
$2.4M
Q2 22
$16.4M
$2.8M
Q1 22
$5.1M
Net Profit
AMBO
AMBO
YQ
YQ
Q2 25
$1.8M
Q3 24
$-342.2K
Q2 24
$123.0K
$-1.1M
Q3 23
$-1.4M
Q2 23
$-1.0M
$-912.0K
Q3 22
$-456.6K
Q2 22
$-11.0M
$-544.4K
Q1 22
$-539.2K
Gross Margin
AMBO
AMBO
YQ
YQ
Q2 25
53.3%
Q3 24
60.9%
Q2 24
55.6%
16.0%
Q3 23
54.1%
Q2 23
44.7%
48.4%
Q3 22
74.5%
Q2 22
9.2%
52.2%
Q1 22
60.7%
Operating Margin
AMBO
AMBO
YQ
YQ
Q2 25
11.9%
Q3 24
-36.3%
Q2 24
2.7%
-89.2%
Q3 23
-174.5%
Q2 23
-27.7%
-83.5%
Q3 22
-22.2%
Q2 22
-13.7%
-25.5%
Q1 22
-12.5%
Net Margin
AMBO
AMBO
YQ
YQ
Q2 25
64.2%
Q3 24
-29.2%
Q2 24
5.1%
-82.5%
Q3 23
-161.6%
Q2 23
-36.7%
-69.2%
Q3 22
-18.9%
Q2 22
-67.1%
-19.8%
Q1 22
-10.6%
EPS (diluted)
AMBO
AMBO
YQ
YQ
Q2 25
$0.03
Q3 24
Q2 24
$0.00
Q3 23
Q2 23
$-0.02
Q3 22
Q2 22
$-0.05
Q1 22

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
AMBO
AMBO
YQ
YQ
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$4.1M
$38.7M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$8.6M
$7.9M
Total Assets
$23.2M
$76.7M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
AMBO
AMBO
YQ
YQ
Q2 25
$4.1M
Q3 24
$38.7M
Q2 24
$1.6M
$48.2M
Q3 23
$59.5M
Q2 23
$6.9M
$36.9M
Q3 22
$117.4M
Q2 22
$9.2M
Q1 22
Stockholders' Equity
AMBO
AMBO
YQ
YQ
Q2 25
$8.6M
Q3 24
$7.9M
Q2 24
$6.6M
$7.9M
Q3 23
$11.3M
Q2 23
$7.4M
$12.4M
Q3 22
$118.3M
Q2 22
$9.4M
Q1 22
Total Assets
AMBO
AMBO
YQ
YQ
Q2 25
$23.2M
Q3 24
$76.7M
Q2 24
$17.6M
$81.2M
Q3 23
$109.8M
Q2 23
$28.8M
$116.2M
Q3 22
$149.4M
Q2 22
$136.4M
Q1 22

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons