vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ambow Education Holding Ltd. (AMBO) and Eva Live Inc (GOAI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Eva Live Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.3M vs $2.8M, roughly 1.6× Ambow Education Holding Ltd.). Ambow Education Holding Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 64.2% vs 39.1%, a 25.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Eva Live Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (47.2% vs 15.3%).
Ambow Education Holding Ltd. is a China-focused education service provider that offers personalized learning solutions, professional career training programs, and K-12 after-school tutoring services. It partners with educational institutions and enterprises to deliver technology-integrated learning resources for learners of all age groups across mainland China.
EVA Airways Corporation is an international airline headquartered in Taoyuan. It is one of the three largest airlines in Taiwan along with China Airlines and Starlux Airlines. The privately owned airline operates passenger and dedicated cargo services to over 40 international destinations in Asia, Australia, Europe and North America. Its network fully consists of international routes, with no domestic routes. It is rated as a 5-star airline by Skytrax, and is the second largest airline based ...
AMBO vs GOAI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.8M | $4.3M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $1.7M |
| Gross Margin | 53.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.9% | 40.1% |
| Net Margin | 64.2% | 39.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.3% | 47.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1343.1% | 23.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $4.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-5.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.0K | $-360.4K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $196.7K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 40.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 37.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | 63.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 54.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 46.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -249.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | -16.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 39.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 64.2% | 63.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 54.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 46.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -249.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | -16.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.16 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.6M | $9.7M |
| Total Assets | $23.2M | $16.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $9.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.6M | $6.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-205.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6M | $-816.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-455.7K |
| Q4 25 | — | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $13.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $9.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.6M | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-183.5K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.11× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-183.5K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-267.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-107.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $109.5K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-781.5K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-449.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-906.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-270.5K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-111.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $106.3K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.04× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.25× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
