vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ambow Education Holding Ltd. (AMBO) and Gaotu Techedu Inc. (GOTU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gaotu Techedu Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($767.1M vs $2.8M, roughly 277.3× Ambow Education Holding Ltd.).
Ambow Education Holding Ltd. is a China-focused education service provider that offers personalized learning solutions, professional career training programs, and K-12 after-school tutoring services. It partners with educational institutions and enterprises to deliver technology-integrated learning resources for learners of all age groups across mainland China.
Gaotu Techedu Inc. is a Chinese education technology company offering online tutoring services for K-12 students, along with foreign language and professional training courses for adults. The company was founded in 2014 by Xiang Dong Chen. Its primary product is the online education platform Genshuixue.
AMBO vs GOTU — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.8M | $767.1M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | — |
| Gross Margin | 53.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.9% | — |
| Net Margin | 64.2% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 15.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 1343.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $767.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $221.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $194.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $205.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $318.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $172.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | $139.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $131.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-20.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8M | $-30.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.0K | $-59.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 66.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.3% | 66.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 69.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 64.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.6% | 69.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 71.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -11.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | -17.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | -46.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -8.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -9.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 64.2% | -15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | -42.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.1M | $596.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.6M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $23.2M | $6.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $596.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $318.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $814.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $433.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $855.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.6M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $264.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6M | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | $6.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $5.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $798.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.6M | $5.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.3B |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.