vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ambow Education Holding Ltd. (AMBO) and Healthcare Triangle, Inc. (HCTI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Healthcare Triangle, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.1M vs $2.8M, roughly 1.1× Ambow Education Holding Ltd.). Ambow Education Holding Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 64.2% vs -143.4%, a 207.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Healthcare Triangle, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (43.4% vs 15.3%).
Ambow Education Holding Ltd. is a China-focused education service provider that offers personalized learning solutions, professional career training programs, and K-12 after-school tutoring services. It partners with educational institutions and enterprises to deliver technology-integrated learning resources for learners of all age groups across mainland China.
Healthcare Triangle, Inc. is a healthcare technology firm that delivers cloud-native data management platforms, AI-powered clinical analytics, and digital workflow solutions. It serves U.S. healthcare providers, payers, and life science organizations, supporting clinical decision-making, care coordination, and operational efficiency across the care continuum.
AMBO vs HCTI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.8M | $3.1M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $-4.5M |
| Gross Margin | 53.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.9% | -141.4% |
| Net Margin | 64.2% | -143.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.3% | 43.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1343.1% | -234.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $-151.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-4.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.0K | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -141.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -74.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | -38.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -37.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -22.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -48.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | -46.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -41.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -143.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -54.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 64.2% | -38.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -45.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -61.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -51.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | -50.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -45.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-151.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.42 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | $-0.58 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.17 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-16783.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-54.78 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | $-70.72 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.42 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.1M | $7.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.6M | $9.9M |
| Total Assets | $23.2M | $22.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $20.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $28.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $29.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $301.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $888.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $9.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.6M | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6M | $-646.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-511.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $22.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $14.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.6M | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-6.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-6.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-5.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-811.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $715.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-935.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-50.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -43.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMBO
Segment breakdown not available.
HCTI
| Software Services | $2.4M | 78% |
| Managed Services And Support | $609.0K | 19% |
| Other | $88.0K | 3% |