vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ambow Education Holding Ltd. (AMBO) and MindWalk Holdings Corp. (HYFT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MindWalk Holdings Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.0M vs $2.8M, roughly 1.1× Ambow Education Holding Ltd.). Ambow Education Holding Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 64.2% vs -94.5%, a 158.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MindWalk Holdings Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (52.4% vs 15.3%).
Ambow Education Holding Ltd. is a China-focused education service provider that offers personalized learning solutions, professional career training programs, and K-12 after-school tutoring services. It partners with educational institutions and enterprises to deliver technology-integrated learning resources for learners of all age groups across mainland China.
AMBO vs HYFT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.8M | $3.0M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $-2.9M |
| Gross Margin | 53.3% | 59.3% |
| Operating Margin | 11.9% | — |
| Net Margin | 64.2% | -94.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.3% | 52.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1343.1% | 81.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $12.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $-2.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-15.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.0K | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 59.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 64.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.3% | 56.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 64.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 51.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -94.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -77.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -93.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 64.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -788.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -95.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -76.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.1M | $10.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.6M | $10.8M |
| Total Assets | $23.2M | $16.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $10.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $12.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $10.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $12.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $15.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.6M | $17.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $18.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $24.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $16.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $19.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $29.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $32.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $33.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $43.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $43.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.6M | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
