vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ambow Education Holding Ltd. (AMBO) and INTRUSION INC (INTZ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ambow Education Holding Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.8M vs $1.5M, roughly 1.9× INTRUSION INC). Ambow Education Holding Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 64.2% vs -190.7%, a 254.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ambow Education Holding Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.3% vs -11.6%).
Ambow Education Holding Ltd. is a China-focused education service provider that offers personalized learning solutions, professional career training programs, and K-12 after-school tutoring services. It partners with educational institutions and enterprises to deliver technology-integrated learning resources for learners of all age groups across mainland China.
INTRUSION INCINTZEarnings & Financial Report
Intrusion Inc. is a cybersecurity company based in Plano, Texas. It provides cybersecurity solutions, including network intrusion detection and prevention systems.
AMBO vs INTZ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.8M | $1.5M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $-2.8M |
| Gross Margin | 53.3% | 74.3% |
| Operating Margin | 11.9% | -192.4% |
| Net Margin | 64.2% | -190.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.3% | -11.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1343.1% | -44.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $-0.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.0K | $-2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 74.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 76.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.3% | 76.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 75.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 74.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 77.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.6% | 76.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 80.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -192.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -108.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | -111.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -117.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -113.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -135.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | -139.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -218.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | -190.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -106.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 64.2% | -109.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -118.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -116.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -136.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | -141.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -151.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | $-0.53 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.94 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.1M | $3.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.6M | $7.3M |
| Total Assets | $23.2M | $10.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $122.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.6M | $11.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6M | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $10.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $13.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $16.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $18.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.6M | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-531.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-549.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -37.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-7.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-531.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-178.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-549.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-645.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | -37.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -153.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -101.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -117.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -38.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -140.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -202.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -104.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 22.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.7% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
