vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ambow Education Holding Ltd. (AMBO) and SES AI Corp (SES). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SES AI Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.6M vs $2.8M, roughly 1.6× Ambow Education Holding Ltd.). Ambow Education Holding Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 64.2% vs -373.5%, a 437.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Ambow Education Holding Ltd. is a China-focused education service provider that offers personalized learning solutions, professional career training programs, and K-12 after-school tutoring services. It partners with educational institutions and enterprises to deliver technology-integrated learning resources for learners of all age groups across mainland China.
SES S.A. is a Luxembourgish communications satellite operator supplying video and data connectivity worldwide to broadcasters, content and internet service providers, mobile and fixed network operators, governments and institutions.
AMBO vs SES — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.8M | $4.6M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $-17.0M |
| Gross Margin | 53.3% | 11.3% |
| Operating Margin | 11.9% | -387.7% |
| Net Margin | 64.2% | -373.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 1343.1% | 50.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $-0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $16.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-17.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-20.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8M | $-22.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-12.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.0K | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-1.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-11.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 51.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.3% | 73.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 78.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.6% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 44.7% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 9.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -387.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -262.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | -652.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -401.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -27.7% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -13.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -373.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -293.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 64.2% | -642.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -214.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -36.7% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -67.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-0.05 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.1M | $29.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.6M | $214.8M |
| Total Assets | $23.2M | $272.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $29.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $35.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $56.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $9.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $214.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $228.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.6M | $249.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $269.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $7.4M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $9.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $272.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $288.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $290.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $306.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.6M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $28.8M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $136.4M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-10.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-11.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -243.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 15.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-61.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-10.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-14.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-10.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-22.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-11.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-14.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-11.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-23.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -243.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -206.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -329.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -410.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 15.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
