vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Ambow Education Holding Ltd. (AMBO) and Seritage Growth Properties (SRG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Seritage Growth Properties is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.2M vs $2.8M, roughly 1.5× Ambow Education Holding Ltd.). On growth, Ambow Education Holding Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.3% vs -4.9%).

Ambow Education Holding Ltd. is a China-focused education service provider that offers personalized learning solutions, professional career training programs, and K-12 after-school tutoring services. It partners with educational institutions and enterprises to deliver technology-integrated learning resources for learners of all age groups across mainland China.

Seritage Growth Properties is a U.S.-headquartered publicly traded real estate investment trust. It owns, redevelops, and manages a diversified portfolio of retail, residential, and mixed-use commercial properties across key U.S. markets, leasing spaces to retail, dining, and service sector tenants.

AMBO vs SRG — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
SRG
SRG
1.5× larger
SRG
$4.2M
$2.8M
AMBO
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
AMBO
AMBO
+20.2% gap
AMBO
15.3%
-4.9%
SRG

Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
AMBO
AMBO
SRG
SRG
Revenue
$2.8M
$4.2M
Net Profit
$1.8M
Gross Margin
53.3%
Operating Margin
11.9%
Net Margin
64.2%
Revenue YoY
15.3%
-4.9%
Net Profit YoY
1343.1%
55.2%
EPS (diluted)
$0.03

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
AMBO
AMBO
SRG
SRG
Q4 25
$4.2M
Q3 25
$4.8M
Q2 25
$2.8M
$4.7M
Q1 25
$4.6M
Q4 24
$4.4M
Q3 24
$3.3M
Q2 24
$2.4M
$4.2M
Q1 24
$5.8M
Net Profit
AMBO
AMBO
SRG
SRG
Q4 25
Q3 25
$-12.4M
Q2 25
$1.8M
$-28.5M
Q1 25
$-22.2M
Q4 24
Q3 24
$-22.0M
Q2 24
$123.0K
$-101.2M
Q1 24
$-19.0M
Gross Margin
AMBO
AMBO
SRG
SRG
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
53.3%
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
55.6%
Q1 24
Operating Margin
AMBO
AMBO
SRG
SRG
Q4 25
Q3 25
-258.0%
Q2 25
11.9%
-610.2%
Q1 25
-486.9%
Q4 24
Q3 24
-673.2%
Q2 24
2.7%
-2366.1%
Q1 24
-328.7%
Net Margin
AMBO
AMBO
SRG
SRG
Q4 25
Q3 25
-259.6%
Q2 25
64.2%
-612.6%
Q1 25
-482.8%
Q4 24
Q3 24
-675.9%
Q2 24
5.1%
-2401.0%
Q1 24
-328.9%
EPS (diluted)
AMBO
AMBO
SRG
SRG
Q4 25
Q3 25
$-0.24
Q2 25
$0.03
$-0.53
Q1 25
$-0.42
Q4 24
Q3 24
$-0.41
Q2 24
$0.00
$-1.82
Q1 24
$-0.36

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
AMBO
AMBO
SRG
SRG
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$4.1M
$48.1M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$8.6M
$331.4M
Total Assets
$23.2M
$393.8M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
AMBO
AMBO
SRG
SRG
Q4 25
$48.1M
Q3 25
$51.5M
Q2 25
$4.1M
$71.8M
Q1 25
$94.3M
Q4 24
$85.2M
Q3 24
$85.6M
Q2 24
$1.6M
$86.7M
Q1 24
$114.9M
Stockholders' Equity
AMBO
AMBO
SRG
SRG
Q4 25
$331.4M
Q3 25
$337.7M
Q2 25
$8.6M
$351.4M
Q1 25
$381.1M
Q4 24
$404.5M
Q3 24
$417.5M
Q2 24
$6.6M
$440.4M
Q1 24
$542.4M
Total Assets
AMBO
AMBO
SRG
SRG
Q4 25
$393.8M
Q3 25
$558.6M
Q2 25
$23.2M
$575.7M
Q1 25
$649.7M
Q4 24
$677.8M
Q3 24
$735.0M
Q2 24
$17.6M
$758.3M
Q1 24
$914.6M

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
AMBO
AMBO
SRG
SRG
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-34.9M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
AMBO
AMBO
SRG
SRG
Q4 25
$-34.9M
Q3 25
$-12.5M
Q2 25
$-12.0M
Q1 25
$-9.2M
Q4 24
$-53.5M
Q3 24
$-15.5M
Q2 24
$-7.5M
Q1 24
$-16.6M

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons