vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ambow Education Holding Ltd. (AMBO) and Twin Vee PowerCats, Co. (VEEE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Twin Vee PowerCats, Co. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.0M vs $2.8M, roughly 1.1× Ambow Education Holding Ltd.). Ambow Education Holding Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 64.2% vs -85.6%, a 149.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Twin Vee PowerCats, Co. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (60.4% vs 15.3%).
Ambow Education Holding Ltd. is a China-focused education service provider that offers personalized learning solutions, professional career training programs, and K-12 after-school tutoring services. It partners with educational institutions and enterprises to deliver technology-integrated learning resources for learners of all age groups across mainland China.
Twin Vee PowerCats Co. is a leading manufacturer of high-performance recreational power catamaran boats. The company offers a diverse lineup of catamaran models suited for leisure cruising, fishing, water sports, and commercial marine use, serving customers primarily across North America, with a growing distribution network in global coastal markets.
AMBO vs VEEE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.8M | $3.0M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $-2.6M |
| Gross Margin | 53.3% | 3.7% |
| Operating Margin | 11.9% | -87.7% |
| Net Margin | 64.2% | -85.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.3% | 60.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1343.1% | -119.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $-1.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.0K | $-4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.3% | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -57.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -5.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.6% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | -87.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -81.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | -35.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -224.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -107.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | -107.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -48.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | -85.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -80.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 64.2% | -34.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -44.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -62.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -103.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | -104.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -44.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | $-0.87 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.51 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.64 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | $-3.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.77 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.1M | $1.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $499.9K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.6M | $13.5M |
| Total Assets | $23.2M | $16.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.04× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $14.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $17.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $499.9K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $499.9K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $499.9K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $499.9K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $499.9K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $499.9K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $499.9K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $499.9K |
| Q4 25 | — | $13.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $15.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.6M | $18.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $22.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $16.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $22.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $23.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $25.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.6M | $33.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $36.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.02× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-1.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-1.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -62.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-9.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-745.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-482.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | -62.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -91.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -30.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -71.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -192.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -128.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -51.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -70.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 22.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 68.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 37.7% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
