vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amber International Holding Ltd (AMBR) and ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Amber International Holding Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9M vs $1.7M, roughly 1.1× ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.). Amber International Holding Ltd runs the higher net margin — 87.5% vs -6.3%, a 93.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Amber International Holding LtdAMBREarnings & Financial Report
Amber Road, Inc. (NYSE: AMBR) was a US-based software company specializing in Global Trade Management (GTM) solutions. It was acquired by E2open in 2019.
ZW Data Action Technologies Inc., trading under the symbol CNET, is a China-based technology enterprise focused on delivering integrated digital marketing solutions, big data analysis services, and intelligent operation tools for enterprise clients across sectors including e-commerce, consumer goods, and internet services. Its offerings help clients optimize user acquisition efficiency, boost operational performance, and advance digital transformation, primarily serving the Chinese domestic market and select Asia-Pacific clients.
AMBR vs CNET — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9M | $1.7M |
| Net Profit | $1.6M | $-108.0K |
| Gross Margin | 39.9% | 5.7% |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | -8.9% |
| Net Margin | 87.5% | -6.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -47.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 94.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $5.3M |
| Q3 25 | — | $-108.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-531.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-781.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-216.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-850.0K | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-1.9M |
| Q3 25 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -0.1% |
| Q3 25 | — | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -35.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -24.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -61.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -26.1% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -33.4% |
| Q3 25 | — | -6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 87.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -32.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -34.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -59.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -24.1% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -36.2% |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $25.8M | $1.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $91.3M | $3.3M |
| Total Assets | $248.2M | $9.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $807.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $812.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $510.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $467.0K | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $817.0K |
| Q3 25 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.4M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $6.3M |
| Q3 25 | — | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $248.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $11.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.1M | $-482.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -2.49× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $-482.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-984.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-830.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-198.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-677.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-353.0K | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-476.0K |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -61.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.49× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMBR
Segment breakdown not available.
CNET
| Online Advertising Placement | $1.6M | 95% |
| Other | $83.0K | 5% |
