vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amber International Holding Ltd (AMBR) and ELECTRO SENSORS INC (ELSE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ELECTRO SENSORS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.8M vs $1.9M, roughly 1.5× Amber International Holding Ltd). Amber International Holding Ltd runs the higher net margin — 87.5% vs 3.7%, a 83.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Amber International Holding LtdAMBREarnings & Financial Report
Amber Road, Inc. (NYSE: AMBR) was a US-based software company specializing in Global Trade Management (GTM) solutions. It was acquired by E2open in 2019.
Polar Electro Oy is a Finnish manufacturer of sports training computers, particularly known for developing the world's first wireless heart rate monitor.
AMBR vs ELSE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9M | $2.8M |
| Net Profit | $1.6M | $103.0K |
| Gross Margin | 39.9% | 50.3% |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | -0.3% |
| Net Margin | 87.5% | 3.7% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 14.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -48.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9M | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $103.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $208.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | $59.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-64.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $201.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $238.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 50.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 53.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | 51.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 48.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 49.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 50.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 47.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -4.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -4.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 87.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.02 | $0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $25.8M | $10.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $91.3M | $14.8M |
| Total Assets | $248.2M | $15.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $10.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.8M | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $14.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $14.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.3M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $14.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $13.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $15.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $15.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $248.2M | $15.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $14.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $14.5M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.1M | $20.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -2.49× | 0.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $20.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $395.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.1M | $277.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-30.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-277.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $362.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-158.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $202.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $389.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-298.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $358.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-184.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -12.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.90× | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.49× | 4.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.38× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 18.36× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
