vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amber International Holding Ltd (AMBR) and GAXOS.AI INC. (GXAI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Amber International Holding Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9M vs $1.2M, roughly 1.5× GAXOS.AI INC.). Amber International Holding Ltd runs the higher net margin — 87.5% vs -77.2%, a 164.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Amber International Holding LtdAMBREarnings & Financial Report
Amber Road, Inc. (NYSE: AMBR) was a US-based software company specializing in Global Trade Management (GTM) solutions. It was acquired by E2open in 2019.
AMBR vs GXAI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9M | $1.2M |
| Net Profit | $1.6M | $-957.9K |
| Gross Margin | 39.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | -99.0% |
| Net Margin | 87.5% | -77.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 94996.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -15.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $-0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $498.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9M | $171.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0 |
| Q4 25 | — | $-957.9K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | $-749.4K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-809.2K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -99.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -263.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | -574.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -77.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -201.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 87.5% | -438.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.02 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.72 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $25.8M | $840.5K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $91.3M | $13.1M |
| Total Assets | $248.2M | $13.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $840.5K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $13.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $14.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.3M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $13.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $14.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $248.2M | $15.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.1M | $-733.1K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -2.49× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-733.1K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.1M | $-716.9K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-738.5K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.49× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
