vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amber International Holding Ltd (AMBR) and Korro Bio, Inc. (KRRO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Amber International Holding Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9M vs $1.3M, roughly 1.5× Korro Bio, Inc.).
Amber International Holding LtdAMBREarnings & Financial Report
Amber Road, Inc. (NYSE: AMBR) was a US-based software company specializing in Global Trade Management (GTM) solutions. It was acquired by E2open in 2019.
Korro Bio, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on developing innovative RNA editing therapies for rare and severe genetic diseases. It leverages its proprietary oligonucleotide platform to target disease-causing mutations, with core pipelines covering ophthalmology, respiratory and neuromuscular disorder segments, striving to address unmet medical needs for global patients.
AMBR vs KRRO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9M | $1.3M |
| Net Profit | $1.6M | — |
| Gross Margin | 39.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | — |
| Net Margin | 87.5% | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | -43.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -136.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9M | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0 |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-18.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | $-25.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-23.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-21.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-21.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-19.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1764.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | -1863.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -981.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1657.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 87.5% | -1765.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -917.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.02 | $-2.74 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.49 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.43 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $25.8M | $75.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $91.3M | $51.4M |
| Total Assets | $248.2M | $113.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $75.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $92.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.8M | $96.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $115.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $137.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $157.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $138.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $51.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $99.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.3M | $115.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $139.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $179.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $198.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $151.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $113.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $161.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $248.2M | $180.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $202.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $243.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $249.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $198.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.1M | $-78.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-79.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -6120.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 40.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -2.49× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-140.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-78.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-17.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.1M | $-19.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-24.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-16.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-14.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-21.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-79.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-17.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-19.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-24.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-21.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-20.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-27.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | -6120.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1592.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1326.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -963.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 40.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.49× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
