vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ametek (AME) and BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ametek is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0B vs $885.8M, roughly 2.3× BWX Technologies, Inc.). Ametek runs the higher net margin — 19.9% vs 10.5%, a 9.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BWX Technologies, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.7% vs 13.4%). Ametek produced more free cash flow last quarter ($527.3M vs $56.8M). Over the past eight quarters, BWX Technologies, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (21.1% CAGR vs 7.3%).
AMETEK, Inc. is an American multinational conglomerate and global designer and manufacturer of electronic instruments and electromechanical devices with headquarters in the United States and over 150 sites worldwide.
BWX Technologies, Inc. is a company headquartered in Lynchburg, Virginia that supplies nuclear components and fuel internationally.
AME vs BWXT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $885.8M |
| Net Profit | $398.6M | $93.0M |
| Gross Margin | 36.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 25.3% | 10.4% |
| Net Margin | 19.9% | 10.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.4% | 18.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 2.9% | 30.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.73 | $1.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $885.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $866.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $764.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $682.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $746.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $672.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $681.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $604.0M |
| Q4 25 | $398.6M | $93.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $371.4M | $82.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $358.4M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $351.8M | $75.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $387.3M | $71.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $340.2M | $69.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $337.7M | $73.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $310.9M | $68.5M |
| Q4 25 | 36.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.3% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | 25.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.1% | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.0% | 24.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.0% | 24.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.1% | 24.6% |
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.0% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.3% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | 12.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.1% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.8% | 14.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.0% | 15.4% |
| Q4 25 | 19.9% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.2% | 10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.3% | 11.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.0% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.5% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.9% | 11.3% |
| Q4 25 | $1.73 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.60 | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.55 | $0.85 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.52 | $0.82 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.67 | $0.77 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.47 | $0.76 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.45 | $0.79 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.34 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $458.0M | $499.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.3B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.6B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $16.1B | $4.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.21× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $458.0M | $499.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $439.2M | $79.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $619.7M | $37.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $399.0M | $55.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $374.0M | $74.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $396.3M | $35.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $396.6M | $48.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $373.8M | $45.9M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $10.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3B | $998.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.0B | $946.2M |
| Q4 25 | $16.1B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.2B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.3B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.9B | $3.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.6B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.9B | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $584.3M | $127.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $527.3M | $56.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 26.4% | 6.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.9% | 7.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.47× | 1.37× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.7B | $295.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $584.3M | $127.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $440.9M | $143.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $359.1M | $159.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $417.5M | $50.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $550.0M | $276.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $487.2M | $32.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $381.4M | $65.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $410.2M | $33.0M |
| Q4 25 | $527.3M | $56.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $420.0M | $94.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $329.8M | $126.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $394.5M | $17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $498.3M | $224.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $460.9M | $-7.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $360.0M | $35.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $382.6M | $2.6M |
| Q4 25 | 26.4% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.2% | 11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.5% | 16.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.8% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.3% | 30.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.0% | -1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.0% | 0.4% |
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 5.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.47× | 1.37× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.19× | 1.74× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.00× | 2.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.19× | 0.67× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.42× | 3.90× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.43× | 0.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.13× | 0.90× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.32× | 0.48× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AME
| Transferred At Point In Time | $1.1B | 54% |
| Electronic Instruments Group | $620.1M | 31% |
| Transferred Over Time | $294.6M | 15% |
BWXT
| Nuclear Component Program | $436.4M | 49% |
| Nuclear Manufacturing | $134.8M | 15% |
| Cost Plus Fee | $116.1M | 13% |
| Uranium And Nuclear Services | $103.8M | 12% |
| Commercial Operations | $49.0M | 6% |
| Commercial Operations Segment | $33.7M | 4% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $1.3M | 0% |
