vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ametek (AME) and Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ametek is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0B vs $7.3M, roughly 274.8× Coda Octopus Group, Inc.). Ametek runs the higher net margin — 19.9% vs 14.1%, a 5.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (43.8% vs 13.4%). Ametek produced more free cash flow last quarter ($527.3M vs $2.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (27.7% CAGR vs 7.3%).
AMETEK, Inc. is an American multinational conglomerate and global designer and manufacturer of electronic instruments and electromechanical devices with headquarters in the United States and over 150 sites worldwide.
CODA plc was a mid-sized international financial software company based in the United Kingdom. Founded in 1979, it was purchased in 2008 by Unit4, a supplier of enterprise software, based in the Netherlands. CODA creates, markets and implements a range of business software systems designed for finance directors and finance departments. These include:financial management systems like accounting software and procurement software: financial analysis applications like reporting, consolidation and...
AME vs CODA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $7.3M |
| Net Profit | $398.6M | $1.0M |
| Gross Margin | 36.0% | 67.6% |
| Operating Margin | 25.3% | 19.3% |
| Net Margin | 19.9% | 14.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.4% | 43.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 2.9% | 214.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.73 | $0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $7.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $5.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $5.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $4.5M |
| Q4 25 | $398.6M | $1.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $371.4M | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $358.4M | $908.8K | ||
| Q1 25 | $351.8M | $913.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $387.3M | $326.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $340.2M | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $337.7M | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $310.9M | $629.9K |
| Q4 25 | 36.0% | 67.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.3% | 68.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | 64.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.1% | 65.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.6% | 65.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.0% | 73.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.0% | 70.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.1% | 69.2% |
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | 19.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | 19.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.0% | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.3% | 12.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.1% | 25.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.8% | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.0% | 12.4% |
| Q4 25 | 19.9% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.2% | 13.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.3% | 17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.0% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.5% | 26.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.9% | 14.1% |
| Q4 25 | $1.73 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.60 | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.55 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.52 | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.67 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.47 | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.45 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.34 | $0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $458.0M | $28.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.3B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.6B | $58.1M |
| Total Assets | $16.1B | $64.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.21× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $458.0M | $28.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $439.2M | $26.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $619.7M | $24.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $399.0M | $22.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $374.0M | $22.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $396.3M | $25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $396.6M | $23.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $373.8M | $25.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $10.6B | $58.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5B | $57.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.4B | $55.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $53.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7B | $53.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.6B | $52.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3B | $51.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.0B | $50.1M |
| Q4 25 | $16.1B | $64.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.2B | $61.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.3B | $60.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.9B | $56.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.6B | $57.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8B | $55.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | $54.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.9B | $53.0M |
| Q4 25 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $584.3M | $2.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $527.3M | $2.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 26.4% | 34.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.9% | 5.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.47× | 2.83× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.7B | $6.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $584.3M | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $440.9M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $359.1M | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $417.5M | $641.5K | ||
| Q4 24 | $550.0M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $487.2M | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $381.4M | $-955.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | $410.2M | $-298.0K |
| Q4 25 | $527.3M | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $420.0M | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $329.8M | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $394.5M | $513.4K | ||
| Q4 24 | $498.3M | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $460.9M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $360.0M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $382.6M | $-433.6K |
| Q4 25 | 26.4% | 34.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.2% | 22.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.5% | 19.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.8% | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.3% | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.0% | 28.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | -20.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.0% | -9.7% |
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.47× | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.19× | 1.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.00× | 1.61× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.19× | 0.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.42× | 6.11× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.43× | 1.34× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.13× | -0.68× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.32× | -0.47× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AME
| Transferred At Point In Time | $1.1B | 54% |
| Electronic Instruments Group | $620.1M | 31% |
| Transferred Over Time | $294.6M | 15% |
CODA
| Segment Reporting | $3.1M | 42% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $1.8M | 24% |
| Precision Acoustics Limited | $1.3M | 18% |
| Other | $1.1M | 15% |
