vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Ametek (AME) and Lamb Weston (LW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Ametek is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.6B, roughly 1.2× Lamb Weston). Ametek runs the higher net margin — 20.7% vs 3.5%, a 17.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ametek posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs 2.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Ametek's revenue compounded faster (5.4% CAGR vs -1.5%).

AMETEK, Inc. is an American multinational conglomerate and global designer and manufacturer of electronic instruments and electromechanical devices with headquarters in the United States and over 150 sites worldwide.

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. is an American food processing company that is one of the world's largest producers and processors of frozen french fries, waffle fries, and other frozen potato products. It is headquartered in Eagle, Idaho, a suburb of Boise.

AME vs LW — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
AME
AME
1.2× larger
AME
$1.9B
$1.6B
LW
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
AME
AME
+8.4% gap
AME
11.3%
2.9%
LW
Higher net margin
AME
AME
17.3% more per $
AME
20.7%
3.5%
LW
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
AME
AME
Annualised
AME
5.4%
-1.5%
LW

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
AME
AME
LW
LW
Revenue
$1.9B
$1.6B
Net Profit
$399.4M
$54.0M
Gross Margin
37.2%
21.2%
Operating Margin
26.7%
8.1%
Net Margin
20.7%
3.5%
Revenue YoY
11.3%
2.9%
Net Profit YoY
13.5%
-63.0%
EPS (diluted)
$1.74
$0.39

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
AME
AME
LW
LW
Q1 26
$1.9B
$1.6B
Q4 25
$2.0B
$1.6B
Q3 25
$1.9B
$1.7B
Q2 25
$1.8B
$1.7B
Q1 25
$1.7B
$1.5B
Q4 24
$1.8B
$1.6B
Q3 24
$1.7B
$1.7B
Q2 24
$1.7B
$1.6B
Net Profit
AME
AME
LW
LW
Q1 26
$399.4M
$54.0M
Q4 25
$398.6M
$62.1M
Q3 25
$371.4M
$64.3M
Q2 25
$358.4M
$119.9M
Q1 25
$351.8M
$146.0M
Q4 24
$387.3M
$-36.1M
Q3 24
$340.2M
$127.4M
Q2 24
$337.7M
$129.6M
Gross Margin
AME
AME
LW
LW
Q1 26
37.2%
21.2%
Q4 25
36.0%
20.0%
Q3 25
36.3%
20.6%
Q2 25
35.8%
20.4%
Q1 25
36.1%
27.8%
Q4 24
36.6%
17.4%
Q3 24
36.0%
21.5%
Q2 24
36.0%
24.1%
Operating Margin
AME
AME
LW
LW
Q1 26
26.7%
8.1%
Q4 25
25.3%
8.6%
Q3 25
25.8%
9.4%
Q2 25
26.0%
11.1%
Q1 25
26.3%
16.4%
Q4 24
26.6%
1.2%
Q3 24
26.1%
12.8%
Q2 24
25.8%
13.2%
Net Margin
AME
AME
LW
LW
Q1 26
20.7%
3.5%
Q4 25
19.9%
3.8%
Q3 25
19.6%
3.9%
Q2 25
20.2%
7.2%
Q1 25
20.3%
9.6%
Q4 24
22.0%
-2.3%
Q3 24
19.9%
7.7%
Q2 24
19.5%
8.0%
EPS (diluted)
AME
AME
LW
LW
Q1 26
$1.74
$0.39
Q4 25
$1.73
$0.44
Q3 25
$1.60
$0.46
Q2 25
$1.55
$0.84
Q1 25
$1.52
$1.03
Q4 24
$1.67
$-0.25
Q3 24
$1.47
$0.88
Q2 24
$1.45
$0.89

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
AME
AME
LW
LW
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$481.3M
$57.5M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$3.6B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.9B
$1.8B
Total Assets
$16.3B
$7.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.99×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
AME
AME
LW
LW
Q1 26
$481.3M
$57.5M
Q4 25
$458.0M
$82.7M
Q3 25
$439.2M
$98.6M
Q2 25
$619.7M
$70.7M
Q1 25
$399.0M
$67.5M
Q4 24
$374.0M
$79.0M
Q3 24
$396.3M
$120.8M
Q2 24
$396.6M
$71.4M
Total Debt
AME
AME
LW
LW
Q1 26
$3.6B
Q4 25
$2.3B
$3.6B
Q3 25
$3.7B
Q2 25
$3.7B
Q1 25
$3.7B
Q4 24
$2.1B
$3.7B
Q3 24
$3.4B
Q2 24
$3.4B
Stockholders' Equity
AME
AME
LW
LW
Q1 26
$10.9B
$1.8B
Q4 25
$10.6B
$1.8B
Q3 25
$10.5B
$1.8B
Q2 25
$10.4B
$1.7B
Q1 25
$10.0B
$1.6B
Q4 24
$9.7B
$1.6B
Q3 24
$9.6B
$1.8B
Q2 24
$9.3B
$1.8B
Total Assets
AME
AME
LW
LW
Q1 26
$16.3B
$7.4B
Q4 25
$16.1B
$7.3B
Q3 25
$16.2B
$7.2B
Q2 25
$15.3B
$7.4B
Q1 25
$14.9B
$7.4B
Q4 24
$14.6B
$7.5B
Q3 24
$14.8B
$7.5B
Q2 24
$14.8B
$7.4B
Debt / Equity
AME
AME
LW
LW
Q1 26
1.99×
Q4 25
0.21×
2.08×
Q3 25
2.05×
Q2 25
2.12×
Q1 25
2.25×
Q4 24
0.22×
2.26×
Q3 24
1.87×
Q2 24
1.92×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
AME
AME
LW
LW
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$65.2M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-36.3M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-2.3%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
6.5%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.21×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$569.2M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
AME
AME
LW
LW
Q1 26
$65.2M
Q4 25
$584.3M
$178.4M
Q3 25
$440.9M
$352.0M
Q2 25
$359.1M
$868.3M
Q1 25
$417.5M
$56.0M
Q4 24
$550.0M
$99.1M
Q3 24
$487.2M
$330.2M
Q2 24
$381.4M
$798.2M
Free Cash Flow
AME
AME
LW
LW
Q1 26
$-36.3M
Q4 25
$527.3M
$101.0M
Q3 25
$420.0M
$274.4M
Q2 25
$329.8M
$230.1M
Q1 25
$394.5M
$-19.8M
Q4 24
$498.3M
$-49.6M
Q3 24
$460.9M
$4.3M
Q2 24
$360.0M
$-131.3M
FCF Margin
AME
AME
LW
LW
Q1 26
-2.3%
Q4 25
26.4%
6.2%
Q3 25
22.2%
16.5%
Q2 25
18.5%
13.7%
Q1 25
22.8%
-1.3%
Q4 24
28.3%
-3.1%
Q3 24
27.0%
0.3%
Q2 24
20.8%
-8.1%
Capex Intensity
AME
AME
LW
LW
Q1 26
6.5%
Q4 25
2.9%
4.8%
Q3 25
1.1%
4.7%
Q2 25
1.6%
38.1%
Q1 25
1.3%
5.0%
Q4 24
2.9%
9.3%
Q3 24
1.5%
19.7%
Q2 24
1.2%
57.7%
Cash Conversion
AME
AME
LW
LW
Q1 26
1.21×
Q4 25
1.47×
2.87×
Q3 25
1.19×
5.47×
Q2 25
1.00×
7.24×
Q1 25
1.19×
0.38×
Q4 24
1.42×
Q3 24
1.43×
2.59×
Q2 24
1.13×
6.16×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

AME
AME

Electronic Instruments$1.3B66%
Electromechanical$663.9M34%

LW
LW

Segments North America$1.0B66%
Segments International$529.8M34%

Related Comparisons