vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ametek (AME) and RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC (RLGT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ametek is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0B vs $232.1M, roughly 8.6× RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC). Ametek runs the higher net margin — 19.9% vs 2.3%, a 17.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ametek posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.4% vs -12.3%). Ametek produced more free cash flow last quarter ($527.3M vs $11.6M). Over the past eight quarters, RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC's revenue compounded faster (12.1% CAGR vs 7.3%).
AMETEK, Inc. is an American multinational conglomerate and global designer and manufacturer of electronic instruments and electromechanical devices with headquarters in the United States and over 150 sites worldwide.
Radiant Logistics, Inc. is a leading third-party logistics provider offering end-to-end supply chain solutions, domestic and international freight forwarding, warehousing, and last-mile delivery services. It primarily serves North American markets, with key client segments including retail, manufacturing, e-commerce, and industrial sectors, helping businesses optimize logistics workflows and cut operational costs.
AME vs RLGT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q2 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $232.1M |
| Net Profit | $398.6M | $5.3M |
| Gross Margin | 36.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 25.3% | 3.2% |
| Net Margin | 19.9% | 2.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.4% | -12.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 2.9% | -18.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.73 | $0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $232.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $226.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $220.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $214.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $264.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $203.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $206.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $184.6M |
| Q4 25 | $398.6M | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $371.4M | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $358.4M | $4.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $351.8M | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $387.3M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $340.2M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $337.7M | $4.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $310.9M | $-703.0K |
| Q4 25 | 36.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.3% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.8% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.0% | -0.5% |
| Q4 25 | 19.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.2% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.5% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.9% | -0.4% |
| Q4 25 | $1.73 | $0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.60 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.55 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.52 | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.67 | $0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.47 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.45 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.34 | $-0.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $458.0M | $31.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.3B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.6B | $229.8M |
| Total Assets | $16.1B | $439.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.21× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $458.0M | $31.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $439.2M | $28.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $619.7M | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $399.0M | $19.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $374.0M | $19.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $396.3M | $10.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $396.6M | $24.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $373.8M | $31.2M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $10.6B | $229.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5B | $225.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.4B | $226.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $218.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7B | $214.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.6B | $212.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3B | $209.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.0B | $206.0M |
| Q4 25 | $16.1B | $439.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.2B | $445.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.3B | $426.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.9B | $414.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.6B | $386.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8B | $375.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | $371.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.9B | $364.0M |
| Q4 25 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $584.3M | $12.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $527.3M | $11.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 26.4% | 5.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.9% | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.47× | 2.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.7B | $8.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $584.3M | $12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $440.9M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $359.1M | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $417.5M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $550.0M | $15.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $487.2M | $205.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $381.4M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $410.2M | $3.9M |
| Q4 25 | $527.3M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $420.0M | $977.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $329.8M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $394.5M | $-6.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $498.3M | $14.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $460.9M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $360.0M | $-185.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $382.6M | $1.8M |
| Q4 25 | 26.4% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.2% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.5% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.8% | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.3% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.0% | -0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.0% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.47× | 2.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.19× | 1.90× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.00× | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.19× | -2.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.42× | 2.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.43× | 0.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.13× | 0.26× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.32× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AME
| Transferred At Point In Time | $1.1B | 54% |
| Electronic Instruments Group | $620.1M | 31% |
| Transferred Over Time | $294.6M | 15% |
RLGT
| Transferred Over Time | $201.2M | 87% |
| Other | $25.0M | 11% |
| Value Added Services | $4.2M | 2% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $1.8M | 1% |
