vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) and PHINIA INC. (PHIN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PHINIA INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($889.0M vs $455.0M, roughly 2.0× American Homes 4 Rent). On growth, PHINIA INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.7% vs 4.2%). American Homes 4 Rent produced more free cash flow last quarter ($823.7M vs $67.0M). Over the past eight quarters, American Homes 4 Rent's revenue compounded faster (3.6% CAGR vs 1.5%).
American Homes 4 RentAMHEarnings & Financial Report
American Homes 4 Rent, doing business as AMH, is a real estate investment trust based in Las Vegas, Nevada, that invests in single-family rental homes. As of December 31, 2019, the company owned 52,552 homes in 22 states. Its largest concentrations are in Atlanta, Dallas-Fort Worth, and Charlotte, North Carolina.
PHINIA Inc. is a global automotive technology provider specializing in fuel injection systems, starters, alternators, and hybrid/electric vehicle components. It serves OEMs and aftermarket customers across North America, Europe, Asia Pacific and key markets, covering passenger car, commercial vehicle and industrial mobility segments.
AMH vs PHIN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $455.0M | $889.0M |
| Net Profit | $144.3M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 21.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 7.8% |
| Net Margin | 31.7% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 4.2% | 6.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 0.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | $1.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $455.0M | $889.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $478.5M | $908.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $457.5M | $890.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $459.3M | $796.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.6M | $833.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $445.1M | $839.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $423.5M | $868.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $423.6M | $863.0M |
| Q4 25 | $144.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.8M | $13.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $123.6M | $46.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $128.7M | $26.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.6M | $31.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.5M | $14.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $128.1M | $29.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 22.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.2% |
| Q4 25 | 31.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.0% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.0% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.7% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.6% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.2% | 3.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.33 | $1.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.27 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.28 | $1.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | $0.63 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.33 | $0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | $0.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.25 | $0.31 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.30 | $0.62 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $108.5M | $359.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1B | $970.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.0B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $13.2B | $3.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.72× | 0.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $108.5M | $359.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.6M | $349.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.3M | $347.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.7M | $373.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $199.4M | $484.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.5M | $477.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $718.4M | $339.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $124.8M | $325.0M |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $970.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $990.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | $990.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | $989.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $988.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $987.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | $821.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5B | $706.0M |
| Q4 25 | $7.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.0B | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | $13.2B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.3B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.6B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.4B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.8B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.3B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.8B | $4.0B |
| Q4 25 | 0.72× | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.68× | 0.62× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.72× | 0.61× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.69× | 0.64× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.70× | 0.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.64× | 0.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.71× | 0.47× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.64× | 0.38× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $864.3M | $96.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $823.7M | $67.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 181.0% | 7.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.9% | 3.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.99× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.5B | $188.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $864.3M | $96.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.3M | $119.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $271.9M | $57.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $223.4M | $40.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $811.5M | $73.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $233.6M | $95.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $274.0M | $109.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $201.8M | $31.0M |
| Q4 25 | $823.7M | $67.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $214.5M | $93.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $257.7M | $23.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $215.9M | $5.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $777.5M | $53.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $225.3M | $70.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $263.3M | $92.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.0M | $-12.0M |
| Q4 25 | 181.0% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.8% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 56.3% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 178.1% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.6% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 62.2% | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.1% | -1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 8.9% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 5.0% |
| Q4 25 | 5.99× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.91× | 9.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.20× | 1.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.74× | 1.54× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.64× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.67× | 3.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.52× | 7.79× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.58× | 1.07× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMH
Segment breakdown not available.
PHIN
| Customer | $618.0M | 70% |
| Fuel Systems | $194.0M | 22% |
| Other | $77.0M | 9% |