vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) and SCANSOURCE, INC. (SCSC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

SCANSOURCE, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($766.5M vs $455.0M, roughly 1.7× American Homes 4 Rent). American Homes 4 Rent runs the higher net margin — 31.7% vs 2.2%, a 29.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, American Homes 4 Rent posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.2% vs 2.5%). American Homes 4 Rent produced more free cash flow last quarter ($823.7M vs $28.9M). Over the past eight quarters, American Homes 4 Rent's revenue compounded faster (3.6% CAGR vs 0.9%).

American Homes 4 Rent, doing business as AMH, is a real estate investment trust based in Las Vegas, Nevada, that invests in single-family rental homes. As of December 31, 2019, the company owned 52,552 homes in 22 states. Its largest concentrations are in Atlanta, Dallas-Fort Worth, and Charlotte, North Carolina.

ScanSource, Inc. is a leading global specialty technology distributor offering a broad portfolio of solutions including point-of-sale systems, barcode scanning tools, cybersecurity products, cloud services and communication solutions. It primarily serves value-added resellers, managed service providers and enterprise clients across North America, Latin America and Europe, covering retail, healthcare, industrial and public sector core segments.

AMH vs SCSC — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
SCSC
SCSC
1.7× larger
SCSC
$766.5M
$455.0M
AMH
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
AMH
AMH
+1.7% gap
AMH
4.2%
2.5%
SCSC
Higher net margin
AMH
AMH
29.6% more per $
AMH
31.7%
2.2%
SCSC
More free cash flow
AMH
AMH
$794.8M more FCF
AMH
$823.7M
$28.9M
SCSC
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
AMH
AMH
Annualised
AMH
3.6%
0.9%
SCSC

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026

Metric
AMH
AMH
SCSC
SCSC
Revenue
$455.0M
$766.5M
Net Profit
$144.3M
$16.5M
Gross Margin
13.4%
Operating Margin
2.3%
Net Margin
31.7%
2.2%
Revenue YoY
4.2%
2.5%
Net Profit YoY
0.3%
-3.3%
EPS (diluted)
$0.33
$0.75

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
AMH
AMH
SCSC
SCSC
Q4 25
$455.0M
$766.5M
Q3 25
$478.5M
$739.6M
Q2 25
$457.5M
$812.9M
Q1 25
$459.3M
$704.8M
Q4 24
$436.6M
$747.5M
Q3 24
$445.1M
$775.6M
Q2 24
$423.5M
$746.1M
Q1 24
$423.6M
$752.6M
Net Profit
AMH
AMH
SCSC
SCSC
Q4 25
$144.3M
$16.5M
Q3 25
$116.8M
$19.9M
Q2 25
$123.6M
$20.1M
Q1 25
$128.7M
$17.4M
Q4 24
$143.9M
$17.1M
Q3 24
$87.6M
$17.0M
Q2 24
$108.5M
$16.1M
Q1 24
$128.1M
$12.8M
Gross Margin
AMH
AMH
SCSC
SCSC
Q4 25
13.4%
Q3 25
14.5%
Q2 25
12.9%
Q1 25
14.2%
Q4 24
13.6%
Q3 24
13.1%
Q2 24
13.0%
Q1 24
12.6%
Operating Margin
AMH
AMH
SCSC
SCSC
Q4 25
2.3%
Q3 25
3.5%
Q2 25
3.3%
Q1 25
3.2%
Q4 24
2.5%
Q3 24
2.3%
Q2 24
2.9%
Q1 24
2.3%
Net Margin
AMH
AMH
SCSC
SCSC
Q4 25
31.7%
2.2%
Q3 25
24.4%
2.7%
Q2 25
27.0%
2.5%
Q1 25
28.0%
2.5%
Q4 24
33.0%
2.3%
Q3 24
19.7%
2.2%
Q2 24
25.6%
2.2%
Q1 24
30.2%
1.7%
EPS (diluted)
AMH
AMH
SCSC
SCSC
Q4 25
$0.33
$0.75
Q3 25
$0.27
$0.89
Q2 25
$0.28
$0.87
Q1 25
$0.30
$0.74
Q4 24
$0.33
$0.70
Q3 24
$0.20
$0.69
Q2 24
$0.25
$0.66
Q1 24
$0.30
$0.50

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
AMH
AMH
SCSC
SCSC
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$108.5M
$83.5M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$5.1B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$7.0B
$910.9M
Total Assets
$13.2B
$1.7B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.72×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
AMH
AMH
SCSC
SCSC
Q4 25
$108.5M
$83.5M
Q3 25
$45.6M
$124.9M
Q2 25
$323.3M
$126.2M
Q1 25
$69.7M
$146.3M
Q4 24
$199.4M
$110.5M
Q3 24
$162.5M
$145.0M
Q2 24
$718.4M
$185.5M
Q1 24
$124.8M
$159.1M
Total Debt
AMH
AMH
SCSC
SCSC
Q4 25
$5.1B
Q3 25
$4.8B
Q2 25
$5.2B
Q1 25
$4.9B
Q4 24
$5.0B
Q3 24
$4.5B
Q2 24
$5.0B
Q1 24
$4.5B
Stockholders' Equity
AMH
AMH
SCSC
SCSC
Q4 25
$7.0B
$910.9M
Q3 25
$7.2B
$914.0M
Q2 25
$7.2B
$906.4M
Q1 25
$7.2B
$901.7M
Q4 24
$7.2B
$900.7M
Q3 24
$7.0B
$920.9M
Q2 24
$7.0B
$924.3M
Q1 24
$7.0B
$944.1M
Total Assets
AMH
AMH
SCSC
SCSC
Q4 25
$13.2B
$1.7B
Q3 25
$13.3B
$1.7B
Q2 25
$13.6B
$1.8B
Q1 25
$13.3B
$1.7B
Q4 24
$13.4B
$1.7B
Q3 24
$12.8B
$1.8B
Q2 24
$13.3B
$1.8B
Q1 24
$12.8B
$1.8B
Debt / Equity
AMH
AMH
SCSC
SCSC
Q4 25
0.72×
Q3 25
0.68×
Q2 25
0.72×
Q1 25
0.69×
Q4 24
0.70×
Q3 24
0.64×
Q2 24
0.71×
Q1 24
0.64×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
AMH
AMH
SCSC
SCSC
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$864.3M
$30.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$823.7M
$28.9M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
181.0%
3.8%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
8.9%
0.3%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
5.99×
1.87×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$1.5B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
AMH
AMH
SCSC
SCSC
Q4 25
$864.3M
$30.8M
Q3 25
$223.3M
$23.2M
Q2 25
$271.9M
Q1 25
$223.4M
$66.1M
Q4 24
$811.5M
$-6.2M
Q3 24
$233.6M
$44.8M
Q2 24
$274.0M
Q1 24
$201.8M
$160.2M
Free Cash Flow
AMH
AMH
SCSC
SCSC
Q4 25
$823.7M
$28.9M
Q3 25
$214.5M
$20.8M
Q2 25
$257.7M
Q1 25
$215.9M
$64.6M
Q4 24
$777.5M
$-8.2M
Q3 24
$225.3M
$42.5M
Q2 24
$263.3M
Q1 24
$191.0M
$157.7M
FCF Margin
AMH
AMH
SCSC
SCSC
Q4 25
181.0%
3.8%
Q3 25
44.8%
2.8%
Q2 25
56.3%
Q1 25
47.0%
9.2%
Q4 24
178.1%
-1.1%
Q3 24
50.6%
5.5%
Q2 24
62.2%
Q1 24
45.1%
21.0%
Capex Intensity
AMH
AMH
SCSC
SCSC
Q4 25
8.9%
0.3%
Q3 25
1.8%
0.3%
Q2 25
3.1%
0.3%
Q1 25
1.6%
0.2%
Q4 24
7.8%
0.3%
Q3 24
1.9%
0.3%
Q2 24
2.5%
0.2%
Q1 24
2.6%
0.3%
Cash Conversion
AMH
AMH
SCSC
SCSC
Q4 25
5.99×
1.87×
Q3 25
1.91×
1.17×
Q2 25
2.20×
Q1 25
1.74×
3.79×
Q4 24
5.64×
-0.36×
Q3 24
2.67×
2.64×
Q2 24
2.52×
Q1 24
1.58×
12.51×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

AMH
AMH

Segment breakdown not available.

SCSC
SCSC

Products And Services$723.4M94%
Intelisys Advisory$25.0M3%
Recurring Revenue$18.2M2%

Related Comparisons