vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) and INTERFACE INC (TILE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
American Homes 4 Rent is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($455.0M vs $349.4M, roughly 1.3× INTERFACE INC). American Homes 4 Rent runs the higher net margin — 31.7% vs 7.0%, a 24.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, INTERFACE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.3% vs 4.2%). American Homes 4 Rent produced more free cash flow last quarter ($823.7M vs $28.6M). Over the past eight quarters, INTERFACE INC's revenue compounded faster (9.8% CAGR vs 3.6%).
American Homes 4 RentAMHEarnings & Financial Report
American Homes 4 Rent, doing business as AMH, is a real estate investment trust based in Las Vegas, Nevada, that invests in single-family rental homes. As of December 31, 2019, the company owned 52,552 homes in 22 states. Its largest concentrations are in Atlanta, Dallas-Fort Worth, and Charlotte, North Carolina.
Interface, Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is a global manufacturer of commercial flooring. The company sells modular carpet tiles, luxury vinyl tile, and Nora brand rubber flooring.
AMH vs TILE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $455.0M | $349.4M |
| Net Profit | $144.3M | $24.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 38.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | 10.1% |
| Net Margin | 31.7% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.2% | 4.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 0.3% | 12.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | $0.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $455.0M | $349.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $478.5M | $364.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $457.5M | $375.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $459.3M | $297.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.6M | $335.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $445.1M | $344.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $423.5M | $346.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $423.6M | $289.7M |
| Q4 25 | $144.3M | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.8M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $123.6M | $32.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $128.7M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.9M | $21.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.6M | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.5M | $22.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $128.1M | $14.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 38.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.4% |
| Q4 25 | 31.7% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.4% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.0% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.0% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.0% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.7% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.6% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.2% | 4.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.33 | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.27 | $0.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.28 | $0.55 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.33 | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.25 | $0.38 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.30 | $0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $108.5M | $71.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1B | $181.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.0B | $640.7M |
| Total Assets | $13.2B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.72× | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $108.5M | $71.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.6M | $187.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.3M | $121.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.7M | $97.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $199.4M | $99.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.5M | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $718.4M | $94.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $124.8M | $89.8M |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $181.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $307.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | $304.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | $302.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $302.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $337.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | $387.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5B | $391.8M |
| Q4 25 | $7.0B | $640.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $621.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2B | $575.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $513.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2B | $489.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0B | $501.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.0B | $451.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.0B | $428.5M |
| Q4 25 | $13.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.8B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | 0.72× | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.68× | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.72× | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.69× | 0.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.70× | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.64× | 0.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.71× | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.64× | 0.91× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $864.3M | $49.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $823.7M | $28.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 181.0% | 8.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.9% | 5.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.99× | 2.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.5B | $121.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $864.3M | $49.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.3M | $76.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $271.9M | $30.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $223.4M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $811.5M | $38.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $233.6M | $76.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $274.0M | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $201.8M | $12.6M |
| Q4 25 | $823.7M | $28.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $214.5M | $66.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $257.7M | $22.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $215.9M | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $777.5M | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $225.3M | $69.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $263.3M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.0M | $8.6M |
| Q4 25 | 181.0% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.8% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 56.3% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 178.1% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.6% | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 62.2% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.1% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | 8.9% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 5.99× | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.91× | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.20× | 0.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.74× | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.64× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.67× | 2.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.52× | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.58× | 0.89× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMH
Segment breakdown not available.
TILE
| AMS | $205.9M | 59% |
| EAAA | $143.5M | 41% |
