vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC (AMN) and Gen Digital (GEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gen Digital is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $748.2M, roughly 1.7× AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC). Gen Digital runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs -1.0%, a 16.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gen Digital posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.5% vs 1.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Gen Digital's revenue compounded faster (13.2% CAGR vs -4.5%).
AMN Healthcare Services Inc. is a leading US healthcare sector workforce solutions and staffing provider. It offers temporary and permanent placement for nurses, physicians, allied health and other clinical/non-clinical staff, plus workforce management tools and consulting for hospitals, clinics and other medical facilities.
Gen Digital Inc. is a multinational software company co-headquartered in both Tempe, Arizona (USA) and Prague, Czech Republic (EU). The company provides cybersecurity software, financial technology, and services. Gen is a Fortune 500 company and a member of the S&P 500 stock-market index. It is listed at both NASDAQ and Prague Stock Exchange. Its portfolio includes Norton, Avast, LifeLock, Avira, AVG, ReputationDefender, MoneyLion and CCleaner.
AMN vs GEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $748.2M | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $-7.7M | $192.0M |
| Gross Margin | 26.1% | 78.4% |
| Operating Margin | 1.1% | 34.9% |
| Net Margin | -1.0% | 15.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.8% | 28.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 95.9% | 6.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.19 | $0.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $748.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $634.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $658.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $689.5M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $734.7M | $986.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $687.5M | $974.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $740.7M | $965.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $192.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-7.7M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.3M | $135.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-116.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.1M | $142.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-187.5M | $159.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0M | $161.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.2M | $181.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 78.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.1% | 78.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.1% | 78.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.7% | 80.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.8% | 80.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.0% | 80.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.0% | 80.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | 35.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | 35.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.6% | 37.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | 43.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.0% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.2% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -25.5% | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 18.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.31 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.19 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.76 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.02 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.90 | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.18 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | $0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $767.1M | $8.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $642.1M | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $15.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.19× | 3.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.8M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.6M | $883.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.6M | $737.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.0M | $644.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $767.1M | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $642.1M | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $644.4M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $607.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $715.1M | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $706.6M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $890.7M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $876.9M | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $15.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $16.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $16.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $15.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $15.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7B | $15.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $15.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.61× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.19× | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.64× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.49× | 3.94× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.33× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $75.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $67.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $233.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $75.6M | $541.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.7M | $409.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $92.7M | $473.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $72.8M | $326.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.7M | $158.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $99.5M | $264.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $67.6M | $535.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.8M | $405.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $68.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.7M | $470.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.6M | $318.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.4M | $156.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.2M | $262.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.0% | 43.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.3% | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.0% | 46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | 16.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | 27.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.2% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 0.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.77× | 3.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.54× | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.13× | 1.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMN
| Travel Nurse Staffing | $208.3M | 28% |
| Allied Staffing | $146.9M | 20% |
| Labor Disruption Services | $124.3M | 17% |
| Technology And Workforce Solutions | $88.0M | 12% |
| Language Services | $69.9M | 9% |
| Other | $29.6M | 4% |
| International Nurse Staffing | $29.6M | 4% |
| Interim Leadership Staffing | $24.1M | 3% |
| Vendor Management Systems | $16.3M | 2% |
| Local Staffing | $8.6M | 1% |
| International Nurse Permanent Placement | $2.6M | 0% |
GEN
| Cyber Safety Platform | $819.0M | 66% |
| Trust Based Solutions | $421.0M | 34% |
| Net Interest Income On Notes Receivable | $4.0M | 0% |
