vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC (AMN) and Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. (HHH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($748.2M vs $624.4M, roughly 1.2× Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.). Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 1.0% vs -1.0%, a 2.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.8% vs -33.2%). Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($348.6M vs $67.6M). Over the past eight quarters, Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (91.0% CAGR vs -4.5%).
AMN Healthcare Services Inc. is a leading US healthcare sector workforce solutions and staffing provider. It offers temporary and permanent placement for nurses, physicians, allied health and other clinical/non-clinical staff, plus workforce management tools and consulting for hospitals, clinics and other medical facilities.
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc., formerly the Howard Hughes Corporation, is a real estate development and management company based in The Woodlands, Texas. It was formed in 2010 as a spin-off from General Growth Properties (GGP). Most of its holdings are focused on several master-planned communities. It took its name from the original Howard Hughes Corporation, which had developed the planned community of Summerlin, Nevada, and later became a subsidiary of GGP.
AMN vs HHH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $748.2M | $624.4M |
| Net Profit | $-7.7M | $6.0M |
| Gross Margin | 26.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.1% | 4.2% |
| Net Margin | -1.0% | 1.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.8% | -33.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 95.9% | -96.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.19 | $0.20 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $748.2M | $624.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $634.5M | $390.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $658.2M | $260.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $689.5M | $199.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $734.7M | $935.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $687.5M | $327.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $740.7M | $317.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $820.9M | $171.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-7.7M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.3M | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-116.2M | $-12.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.1M | $10.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-187.5M | $156.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0M | $72.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.2M | $21.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.3M | $-52.5M |
| Q4 25 | 26.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.8% | 26.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 24.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.6% | 33.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 60.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.9% | -9.8% |
| Q4 25 | -1.0% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.7% | -4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.2% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -25.5% | 16.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 22.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.1% | -30.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.19 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.76 | $2.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.02 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.90 | $3.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.18 | $1.46 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | $0.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.45 | $-1.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.0M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $767.1M | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $642.1M | $3.8B |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $10.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.19× | 1.35× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.8M | $493.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.6M | $596.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.6M | $400.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.0M | $436.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $50.6M | $462.7M |
| Q4 25 | $767.1M | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $642.1M | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $644.4M | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $607.6M | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $715.1M | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $706.6M | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $890.7M | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $876.9M | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $854.2M | $2.9B |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $10.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $10.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $9.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $9.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7B | $9.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9B | $9.6B |
| Q4 25 | 1.19× | 1.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.49× | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $75.6M | $360.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $67.6M | $348.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.0% | 55.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | 1.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 60.04× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $233.8M | $417.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $75.6M | $360.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.7M | $149.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.5M | $177.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $92.7M | $-224.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $72.8M | $337.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.7M | $248.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $99.5M | $-17.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.4M | $-171.2M |
| Q4 25 | $67.6M | $348.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.8M | $137.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $68.7M | $169.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.7M | $-238.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.6M | $317.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.4M | $238.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.2M | $-25.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.2M | $-182.0M |
| Q4 25 | 9.0% | 55.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.3% | 35.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.4% | 65.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.0% | -119.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | 33.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | 73.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | -7.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.7% | -106.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 6.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.2% | 6.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 60.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.77× | 1.25× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -21.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.54× | 3.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.13× | -0.83× | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.70× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMN
| Travel Nurse Staffing | $208.3M | 28% |
| Allied Staffing | $146.9M | 20% |
| Labor Disruption Services | $124.3M | 17% |
| Technology And Workforce Solutions | $88.0M | 12% |
| Language Services | $69.9M | 9% |
| Other | $29.6M | 4% |
| International Nurse Staffing | $29.6M | 4% |
| Interim Leadership Staffing | $24.1M | 3% |
| Vendor Management Systems | $16.3M | 2% |
| Local Staffing | $8.6M | 1% |
| International Nurse Permanent Placement | $2.6M | 0% |
HHH
| Transferred At Point In Time | $499.8M | 80% |
| Operating Assets Segment | $117.9M | 19% |
| Builder Price Participation | $12.9M | 2% |