vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICOLD REALTY TRUST (COLD) and Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. (HHH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMERICOLD REALTY TRUST is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($643.1M vs $624.4M, roughly 1.0× Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.). Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 1.0% vs -13.7%, a 14.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICOLD REALTY TRUST posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.7% vs -33.2%). Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($348.6M vs $-12.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (91.0% CAGR vs -0.6%).
Americold Realty Trust, Inc. is an American temperature controlled warehousing and transportation company based in Atlanta, Georgia, United States. It is in the business of modern commercialized temperature controlled warehousing for the storage of perishable goods via a cold chain, one of the forms of food preservation. Americold is the 2nd largest temperature-controlled warehousing and distribution services provider in the world.
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc., formerly the Howard Hughes Corporation, is a real estate development and management company based in The Woodlands, Texas. It was formed in 2010 as a spin-off from General Growth Properties (GGP). Most of its holdings are focused on several master-planned communities. It took its name from the original Howard Hughes Corporation, which had developed the planned community of Summerlin, Nevada, and later became a subsidiary of GGP.
COLD vs HHH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $643.1M | $624.4M |
| Net Profit | $-88.3M | $6.0M |
| Gross Margin | 31.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -10.8% | 4.2% |
| Net Margin | -13.7% | 1.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.7% | -33.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -143.9% | -96.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.31 | $0.20 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $643.1M | $624.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $649.0M | $390.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $635.1M | $260.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $613.7M | $199.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $647.4M | $935.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $660.4M | $327.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $645.6M | $317.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $651.4M | $171.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-88.3M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.4M | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5M | $-12.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-16.4M | $10.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-36.2M | $156.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.7M | $72.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-64.1M | $21.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.7M | $-52.5M |
| Q4 25 | 31.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | -10.8% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.9% | 26.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.6% | 24.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.8% | 33.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 60.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.4% | -9.8% |
| Q4 25 | -13.7% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.8% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | -4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | 16.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.6% | 22.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.9% | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | -30.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.31 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.04 | $2.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.06 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.12 | $3.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.01 | $1.46 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.23 | $0.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.03 | $-1.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $136.9M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.9B | $3.8B |
| Total Assets | $8.1B | $10.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.35× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $136.9M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $101.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.9M | $493.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.7M | $596.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $400.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.2M | $436.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.2M | $462.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6B | $2.9B |
| Q4 25 | $8.1B | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.1B | $10.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1B | $10.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8B | $9.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.7B | $9.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9B | $9.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.8B | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.8B | $9.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $130.2M | $360.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.2M | $348.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.9% | 55.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 22.1% | 1.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 60.04× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-217.2M | $417.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $130.2M | $360.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $78.9M | $149.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $120.3M | $177.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.2M | $-224.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.6M | $337.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.6M | $248.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $136.7M | $-17.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $62.0M | $-171.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.2M | $348.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-65.4M | $137.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-57.4M | $169.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-82.3M | $-238.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.4M | $317.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-44.5M | $238.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.3M | $-25.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.2M | $-182.0M |
| Q4 25 | -1.9% | 55.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.1% | 35.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.0% | 65.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.4% | -119.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.9% | 33.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.7% | 73.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.4% | -7.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.5% | -106.4% |
| Q4 25 | 22.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.2% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.0% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.3% | 6.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.3% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.0% | 6.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 60.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.25× | ||
| Q2 25 | 78.18× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -21.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.83× | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.36× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
COLD
| Warehouse Services | $269.0M | 42% |
| Warehouse Rent And Storage | $199.9M | 31% |
| Other Facilities Costs | $60.0M | 9% |
| Transportation Segment | $48.3M | 8% |
| Power | $34.7M | 5% |
| Transportation | $22.0M | 3% |
| Third Party Managed Segment | $9.5M | 1% |
| Third Party Managed | $2.4M | 0% |
HHH
| Transferred At Point In Time | $499.8M | 80% |
| Operating Assets Segment | $117.9M | 19% |
| Builder Price Participation | $12.9M | 2% |
