vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALPHA MODUS HOLDINGS, INC. (AMOD) and JOINT Corp (JYNT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
JOINT Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($15.2M vs $30, roughly 505568.2× ALPHA MODUS HOLDINGS, INC.). JOINT Corp runs the higher net margin — 6.5% vs -2221643.3%, a 2221649.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ALPHA MODUS HOLDINGS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (500.0% vs 3.1%). Over the past eight quarters, ALPHA MODUS HOLDINGS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (447.7% CAGR vs -28.6%).
The Joint Corp is a leading operator and franchisor of chiropractic care clinics primarily serving the U.S. market. It offers accessible, affordable routine chiropractic services, membership-based care plans, and caters to consumers seeking non-invasive musculoskeletal pain management and wellness support.
AMOD vs JYNT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $30 | $15.2M |
| Net Profit | $-666.5K | $991.1K |
| Gross Margin | — | 81.4% |
| Operating Margin | -5061063.3% | 4.9% |
| Net Margin | -2221643.3% | 6.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 500.0% | 3.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -113.8% | 5510.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | $0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $30 | $15.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $0 | $13.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | $13.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6 | $13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5 | $14.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3 | $30.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4 | $30.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1 | $29.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-666.5K | $991.1K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.3M | $855.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.8M | $93.4K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-308.1K | $967.8K | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8M | $17.7K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-315.7K | $-3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-187.0K | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-222.7K | $947.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 81.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 80.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 79.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 77.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 78.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 90.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 90.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 90.9% |
| Q4 25 | -5061063.3% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -22653350.0% | -5.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4746000.0% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -9537700.0% | -1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3013825.0% | -5.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -19091100.0% | -1.4% |
| Q4 25 | -2221643.3% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5134683.3% | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 96570920.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10524866.7% | -10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4675925.0% | -11.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -22269600.0% | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.05 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.22 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.27 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.05 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.06 | $0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $23.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-49.0M | $15.1M |
| Total Assets | $815.8K | $61.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $23.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $29.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $29.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $21.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $25.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $20.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $17.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $18.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-49.0M | $15.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-51.6M | $22.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-50.5M | $23.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-80.9M | $22.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-80.6M | $20.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.6M | $20.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.3M | $23.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.1M | $26.2M |
| Q4 25 | $815.8K | $61.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $403.3K | $69.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $660.5K | $73.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $903.4K | $80.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7M | $83.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $79.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.5M | $82.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.5M | $85.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.2M | $2.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $2.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 16.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.92× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $334.7K |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-940.3K | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-521.2K | $868.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-594.1K | $-3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.1M | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-258.6K | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-107.9K | $-973.5K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-175.3K | $2.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-940.9K | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $363.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -30.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 26.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -4.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.92× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.30× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.82× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.23× | 233.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.97× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMOD
Segment breakdown not available.
JYNT
| Transferred At Point In Time | $12.8M | 84% |
| Transferred Over Time | $2.4M | 16% |
