vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALPHA MODUS HOLDINGS, INC. (AMOD) and Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($346.7M vs $30, roughly 11556866.7× ALPHA MODUS HOLDINGS, INC.). Dolby Laboratories, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 15.4% vs -2221643.3%, a 2221658.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ALPHA MODUS HOLDINGS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (500.0% vs -2.9%). Over the past eight quarters, ALPHA MODUS HOLDINGS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (447.7% CAGR vs -2.5%).
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is an American technology corporation specializing in audio noise reduction, audio encoding/compression, spatial audio, and high-dynamic-range television (HDR) imaging. Dolby licenses its technologies to consumer electronics manufacturers.
AMOD vs DLB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q1 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $30 | $346.7M |
| Net Profit | $-666.5K | $53.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 87.5% |
| Operating Margin | -5061063.3% | 17.9% |
| Net Margin | -2221643.3% | 15.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 500.0% | -2.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -113.8% | -21.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | $0.55 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $30 | $346.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $0 | $307.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | $315.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6 | $369.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5 | $357.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3 | $304.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4 | $288.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1 | $364.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-666.5K | $53.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.3M | $49.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.8M | $46.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-308.1K | $91.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8M | $67.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-315.7K | $58.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-187.0K | $38.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-222.7K | $97.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 87.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 87.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 86.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 90.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 88.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 88.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 87.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 89.4% |
| Q4 25 | -5061063.3% | 17.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -22653350.0% | 29.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4746000.0% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -9537700.0% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3013825.0% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -19091100.0% | 29.9% |
| Q4 25 | -2221643.3% | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5134683.3% | 24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 96570920.0% | 19.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10524866.7% | 19.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4675925.0% | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -22269600.0% | 26.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.05 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $0.50 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.22 | $0.48 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $0.94 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.27 | $0.70 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.05 | $0.59 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $0.40 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.06 | $1.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $644.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-49.0M | $2.6B |
| Total Assets | $815.8K | $3.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $644.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $702.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $699.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $626.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $520.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $482.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $869.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $825.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-49.0M | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-51.6M | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-50.5M | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-80.9M | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-80.6M | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.6M | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.3M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.1M | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | $815.8K | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $403.3K | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $660.5K | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $903.4K | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7M | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.5M | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.5M | $3.0B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.2M | $54.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $50.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 14.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $386.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | $54.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-940.3K | $122.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-521.2K | $67.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-594.1K | $174.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.1M | $106.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-258.6K | $116.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-107.9K | $21.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-175.3K | $181.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $50.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-940.9K | $106.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $61.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $168.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $108.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $172.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 45.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 35.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 47.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.91× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.23× | 1.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.55× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.85× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMOD
Segment breakdown not available.
DLB
| Licensing Brodcast Revenue | $100.3M | 29% |
| Licensing Mobile Revenue | $74.9M | 22% |
| Licensing Other Revenue | $70.2M | 20% |
| Licensing CE Revenue | $45.6M | 13% |
| Licensing PC Revenue | $28.7M | 8% |
| Products And Services | $26.9M | 8% |
